Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialThe relationship of posttetanic count and train-of-four responses during recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade.
Posttetanic count (PTC) has been used to quantify intense degrees of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Our objective in the present investigation was to discern whether PTC correlates with recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade under both inhaled and IV anesthesia. In 60 patients, anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and fentanyl 1.5 micro g/kg IV. Recovery from intense neuromuscular blockade induced by cisatracurium (0.15 mg/kg) was studied in 2 groups. Group 1 (n = 30) had anesthesia maintained with propofol 100-200 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1) and 60% N(2)O in O(2), whereas Group 2 (n = 30) had anesthesia maintained with isoflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.8%) and 60% N(2)O in O(2). Neuromuscular functions were monitored using acceleromyography. Cycles of posttetanic stimulation were repeated every 6 min with train-of-four (TOF) stimulation in between. Measurement included times to posttetanic responses and to the first response to TOF stimulation (T(1)), as well as the correlation between PTC and T(1). In Group 1, the mean times to PTC(1) and T(1) were 35.6 +/- 7.5 and 46.9 +/- 6.5 min, respectively. Corresponding times in Group 2 were 39.5 +/- 6.8 and 56.7 +/- 5.4 min, respectively. There was a good time correlation, r = 0.919 for propofol (Group 1) and r = 0.779 for isoflurane (Group 2), between PTC and T(1) recovery in both groups. The PTC when T(1) appeared ranged between 8 and 9 in Group 1 and 8 and 14 in Group 2. Conforming to original observations with other neuromuscular blocking drugs, there is a correlation between PTC and TOF recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade allowing better monitoring of this intense degree of blockade during both IV (propofol) and isoflurane anesthesia. ⋯ Monitoring posttetanic count during intense neuromuscular blockade allows the clinician to estimate the intensity of the blockade and estimate recovery time. The relationship between posttetanic count and train-of-four recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was documented under both IV and inhaled anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of intrathecal opioid and intravenous analgesia for the incidence of cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complications after abdominal aortic surgery.
Major surgery evokes a stress response that can produce deleterious consequences, especially in a population at high risk for those complications. We tested the hypothesis that decreasing or eliminating one of the sources of stress by providing intense analgesia in the immediate postoperative period via application of neuraxial opioids would decrease major nonsurgical complications. Two-hundred-seventeen patients scheduled to undergo abdominal aortic surgery were randomly allocated to receive either general anesthesia alone (control) or general anesthesia combined with intrathecal opioid (1 micro g/kg sufentanil with 8 micro g/kg preservative-free morphine injected at the L4-5 interspace). Postoperative care was identical in the two groups, including patient-controlled analgesia. Each patient provided an assessment of postoperative pain using a visual analog scale. Postopera-tive complications were recorded according to criteria established a priori. The administration of intrathecal opioid provided more intense analgesia than patient-controlled analgesia during the first 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.05). There was no difference between groups for the incidence of combined major cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complications (P > 0.05) or mortality (P > 0.05). The incidence of myocardial damage or infarction, as defined by abnormal plasma concentration of troponin I, did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). In patients undergoing major abdominal vascular surgery, decrease of one contributor to postoperative stress, by provision of intense analgesia for the intraoperative and initial postoperative period, via application of neuraxial opioid, does not alter the combined major cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complication rate. ⋯ Provision of intense analgesia for the initial postoperative period after major abdominal vascular surgery, via the administration of neuraxial opioid, does not alter the combined incidence of major cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complications.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and dexamethasone plus ondansetron as prophylactic antiemetic and antipruritic therapy in patients receiving intrathecal morphine for major orthopedic surgery.
In a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial, we evaluated the efficacy of IV (a) dexamethasone 8 mg, (b) ondansetron 8 mg, and (c) dexamethasone 8 mg plus ondansetron 4 mg for the prevention of postoperative nausea, vomiting (PONV), and pruritus in 130 (ASA physical status I to III) patients undergoing elective major orthopedic surgery after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine. After spinal anesthesia, patients were randomized to one of three groups. Failure of PONV prophylaxis in the 24-h postoperative period occurred more frequently in patients who received dexamethasone alone (29 of 40; 73%) compared with those who received either ondansetron alone (23 of 47; 49%) (P = 0.02) or dexamethasone plus ondansetron together (19 of 43; 44%)(P = 0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of failure of prophylaxis of pruritus (70%, 72%, and 70% in dexamethasone 8 mg, ondansetron 8 mg, and dexamethasone 8 mg plus ondansetron 4 mg, respectively) (P > 0.1) in the 24-h postoperative period. We conclude that the administration of dexamethasone 8 mg with ondansetron 4 mg has no added benefit compared with ondansetron 8 mg alone in the prophylaxis of PONV and pruritus. ⋯ Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pruritus are common side effects after spinal opioid administration. In this study, dexamethasone 8 mg plus ondansetron 4 mg was as effective as ondansetron 8 mg. The administration of dexamethasone alone was associated with a frequent incidence of PONV, demonstrating a lack of efficacy. This has important cost implications.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Comparative Study Clinical TrialA prospective one-year outcome study of interdisciplinary chronic pain management: compromising its efficacy by managed care policies.
Although interdisciplinary pain management programs are both therapeutically effective as well as cost-effective, they are currently being underutilized because of managed care policies. We used this prospective comparison trial, with 1-yr follow-up of chronic pain patients, to demonstrate the short- and long-term efficacy of an interdisciplinary pain management program, and evaluate the impact of managed care's physical therapy "carve out" practices on these treatment outcomes. Consecutive chronic pain patients (n = 201) were evaluated, some of whom had their physical therapy "carved out" from this integrated program. Results revealed that successful completion of interdisciplinary pain management was therapeutically effective. Most importantly, physical therapy "carved out" practices had a negative impact on both the short-term and 1-yr follow-up outcome measures. Thus, interdisciplinary pain management is effective in treating the major health problem of chronic pain. However, insurance carrier policies of contracting treatment "carve outs" significantly compromise the efficacy of this evidence-based, best standard of medical care treatment. This raises important medico-legal and ethical issues. ⋯ Interdisciplinary pain management is effective and cost-effective in treating the major health problem of chronic pain. The present study demonstrated its efficacy using a prospective, 1-yr posttreatment evaluation methodology. Moreover, physical therapy "carve out" practices by insurance carriers had a negative impact on the outcomes, raising important medico-legal and ethical issues.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSeverity of baseline pain and degree of analgesia in the third molar post-extraction dental pain model.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether different levels of pain would respond similarly to analgesia. We compared the analgesic response to ibuprofen in subjects with moderate versus severe baseline pain in clinical trials using the third molar post-extraction dental pain model. We performed a pooled raw data analysis of 517 subjects included in the ibuprofen treatment arm of 11 similar studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were similar in all studies. All studies used the same metrics and recorded pain at the same times. As expected, the well established analgesic effect of ibuprofen was confirmed. More intense baseline pain was initially associated with a larger decrease and greater fractional decreasing in pain intensity after medication. A larger percentage of those with milder baseline pain obtained relief compared with those with severe baseline pain. Reduction in pain intensity occurred mainly in the first 2 h. At later time points, the association of baseline conditions with a reduction in pain level diminished. We conclude that the intensity of initial pain is not correlated with the need for larger doses of analgesic. ⋯ A person taking an analgesic wants to know when and how well it will work. People with moderate pain are more likely to get relief, whereas those with severe pain who get relief will get relatively more relief. Most relief of acute pain occurs within less than 2 h. These data indicate that most people with intense initial pain do not require larger doses of analgesics.