Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSmall dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal analgesia combined with morphine for labor.
We investigated the duration of labor analgesia produced by a small dose of spinal bupivacaine/fentanyl alone or in combination with a small dose of morphine. Sixty parturients were enrolled in this placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomized trial. All women received a spinal injection of 12.5 micro g of fentanyl with 2 mg of bupivacaine. The morphine group (MBF) also received 125 micro g of morphine; the placebo group (BF) received saline. Pain scores were <3 of 10 within 10 min of injection. The median duration of analgesia was similar between groups (89 min versus 84 min; P = not significant), and only 20% of the MBF group experienced prolonged analgesia. During subsequent epidural analgesia, the MBF group had a significantly lesser rate of breakthrough pain (0.15 +/- 0.14 episodes per hour versus 0.26 +/- 0.18 episodes per hour; P = 0.02). Also, during the first 24 h postpartum, the MBF group required significantly fewer medications (3.3 +/- 3.7 doses versus 4.7 +/- 3.5 doses; P = 0.04). Intrathecal injection of this small dose of bupivacaine/fentanyl produced a rapid onset of labor analgesia; the addition of a small dose of morphine did not significantly prolong analgesia, but it improved subsequent pain relief, as measured by the rate of breakthrough pain and postpartum medication requirements. This may provide a clinically useful means of improving intra- and postpartum pain relief. ⋯ A small dose of intrathecal fentanyl 12.5 micro g and bupivacaine 2 mg produces effective labor analgesia lasting for approximately 85 min. The addition of a small 125- micro g dose of morphine improves pain control during subsequent epidural analgesia and reduces the requirements for postpartum pain medications.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Comparative Study Clinical TrialA prospective one-year outcome study of interdisciplinary chronic pain management: compromising its efficacy by managed care policies.
Although interdisciplinary pain management programs are both therapeutically effective as well as cost-effective, they are currently being underutilized because of managed care policies. We used this prospective comparison trial, with 1-yr follow-up of chronic pain patients, to demonstrate the short- and long-term efficacy of an interdisciplinary pain management program, and evaluate the impact of managed care's physical therapy "carve out" practices on these treatment outcomes. Consecutive chronic pain patients (n = 201) were evaluated, some of whom had their physical therapy "carved out" from this integrated program. Results revealed that successful completion of interdisciplinary pain management was therapeutically effective. Most importantly, physical therapy "carved out" practices had a negative impact on both the short-term and 1-yr follow-up outcome measures. Thus, interdisciplinary pain management is effective in treating the major health problem of chronic pain. However, insurance carrier policies of contracting treatment "carve outs" significantly compromise the efficacy of this evidence-based, best standard of medical care treatment. This raises important medico-legal and ethical issues. ⋯ Interdisciplinary pain management is effective and cost-effective in treating the major health problem of chronic pain. The present study demonstrated its efficacy using a prospective, 1-yr posttreatment evaluation methodology. Moreover, physical therapy "carve out" practices by insurance carriers had a negative impact on the outcomes, raising important medico-legal and ethical issues.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAortocaval compression in pregnancy: the effect of changing the degree and direction of lateral tilt on maternal cardiac output.
Using thoracic bioimpedance to measure maternal cardiac output, we were unable to demonstrate any benefit from increasing the magnitude of lateral table tilt. This implies that it is unnecessary to use extremes of lateral table tilt in healthy pregnancy although this may not apply to women with cardiac compromise or regional anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSeverity of baseline pain and degree of analgesia in the third molar post-extraction dental pain model.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether different levels of pain would respond similarly to analgesia. We compared the analgesic response to ibuprofen in subjects with moderate versus severe baseline pain in clinical trials using the third molar post-extraction dental pain model. We performed a pooled raw data analysis of 517 subjects included in the ibuprofen treatment arm of 11 similar studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were similar in all studies. All studies used the same metrics and recorded pain at the same times. As expected, the well established analgesic effect of ibuprofen was confirmed. More intense baseline pain was initially associated with a larger decrease and greater fractional decreasing in pain intensity after medication. A larger percentage of those with milder baseline pain obtained relief compared with those with severe baseline pain. Reduction in pain intensity occurred mainly in the first 2 h. At later time points, the association of baseline conditions with a reduction in pain level diminished. We conclude that the intensity of initial pain is not correlated with the need for larger doses of analgesic. ⋯ A person taking an analgesic wants to know when and how well it will work. People with moderate pain are more likely to get relief, whereas those with severe pain who get relief will get relatively more relief. Most relief of acute pain occurs within less than 2 h. These data indicate that most people with intense initial pain do not require larger doses of analgesics.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSex-based ProSeal laryngeal mask airway size selection: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized, paralyzed male and female adult patients.
We compared the Size 4 and 5 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in men and the Size 3 and 4, and 4 and 5 PLMA in women in terms of 1) ease of insertion, 2) oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), 3) ease of ventilation at a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg, 4) gas exchange, 5) location of gas leak, 6) anatomic position of the airway and drain tube, and 7) mucosal injury. Thirty male and 60 female (ASA physical status I-II; 18-80 yr old) anesthetized, paralyzed patients were studied in a crossover fashion in three equal-sized groups. PLMA insertion was performed by a single experienced operator by using digital manipulation. In male patients comparing the Size 4 and 5, OLP was higher (P = 0.0002) and leak fraction lower (P = 0.03) for the Size 5, but the number of insertion attempts, insertion time, mucosal injury, anatomic position, gas exchange, and location of gas leak were similar. In female patients comparing the Size 4 and 5 PLMA, OLP was higher for the Size 5 (P < 0.0001), but the number of insertion attempts was fewer (P = 0.02), insertion time was quicker (P = 0.02), and there was less mucosal injury (P = 0.01) with the Size 4. There were no differences in anatomic position, gas exchange, or location of gas leak. In female patients comparing the Size 3 and 4 PLMA, OLP was higher (P = 0.0005) and leak fraction was lower (P = 0.03) for the Size 4, but the number of insertion attempts, insertion time, mucosal injury, anatomic position, gas exchange, and location of gas leak were similar. There were no episodes of failed oxygenation, failed ventilation, or gastric insufflation. We conclude that if size is selected by sex, the Size 4 PLMA is preferable for women and the Size 5 PLMA for men. ⋯ When sex is used to select the appropriate size of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, the Size 4 ProSeal is preferable for women and the Size 5 ProSeal for men.