The Annals of thoracic surgery
-
Lung resection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is associated with multiple clinical benefits compared with resection by thoracotomy (OPEN). Less is known about reimbursements, costs, and resource use with each approach. This study used a commercial insurance claims database to examine differences between VATS and OPEN lung resections in payment, health care utilization, and estimated days off work for health care visits. ⋯ Compared with an OPEN approach, lobectomy and wedge resection by VATS were associated with lower hospital and physician payments. In addition, lobectomy by VATS was associated with less health care utilization in the early postoperative period and during the first year after the operation. These payment and utilization reductions are important in an era of value-based purchasing in health care.