Transplantation proceedings
-
Comparative Study
Intraoperative fluid management of living donor versus cadaveric liver transplant recipients.
Living donor liver transplantation has increasingly become an alternative to cadaveric donor liver transplants for select adult patients. Because these cases can be performed electively, living donor recipients may have better compensated liver disease at the time of surgery than cadaver donor recipients. However, it is unknown if this difference would have a significant effect on their intraoperative course. ⋯ The PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio at the end of the procedure was significantly better in patients receiving livers from living rather than from cadaveric donors (P/F ratio 335 +/- 114 mm Hg vs 271 +/- 174, P < .05). Our results indicate that while intraoperative fluid and transfusion requirements are similar, the impact of transplantation on pulmonary gas exchange is more pronounced in patients receiving organs from cadaveric donors. This difference may arise from longer cold ischemia times present in the cadaveric donor group.
-
Although the use of non-heart beating donors (NHBD) could bridge the widening gap between organ demand and supply, its application to liver transplantation is limited due to warm ischemia (WI), biliary tree injury, and inadequate organ assessment. Warm blood reperfusion using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be a suitable option to reduce WI in organs from NHBD, allowing one to determine hepatic flow characteristics and bile production and facilitating assessment of organ viability. ⋯ In this preheparinized NHBD swine model, ECMO support restores liver perfusion, oxygenation, and bile production after 60 minutes of CA. Quantification and analysis of bile production could be a determinant of liver function during ECMO resuscitation, and it may be a predictor of graft viability before transplantation.