Military medicine
-
Comparative Study
The fitness training unit in U.S. Army basic combat training: physical fitness, training outcomes, and injuries.
This study involved a retrospective examination of physical fitness, training outcomes, and injury rates among personnel in the Fitness Training Unit (FTU). Personnel were assigned to the FTU based on low performance on push-ups, sit-ups, and/or a 1-mile run (N = 44 men, 95 women) and received an augmented physical fitness program before basic combat training (BCT). They were compared with 712 men and 379 women who took the same test but were not assigned to the FTU and went directly to BCT. ⋯ FTU women and non-FTU women had similar graduation success (60% vs. 68%, respectively; p = 0.14) and time-loss injury rates (1.3 vs. 1.4 people injured/100 person-days, respectively; p = 0.90). FTU men were less likely to graduate than non-FTU men (55% vs. 82%; p < 0.01) and more likely to suffer a time-loss injury (1.2 vs. 0.7 people injured/100 person-days; p < 0.01). Efforts should be directed toward providing a sufficient training stimulus to improve the aerobic fitness level of men (as well as women) in the FTU.
-
The 67th Combat Support Hospital at Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo, treated victims of trauma on an almost daily basis at the beginning of U. S. peacekeeping efforts in the region. Military health care personnel must respond quickly and efficiently when confronted with patient wounds resulting in massive blood losses. ⋯ Early volume/blood resuscitation before, during, and after surgery led to a massive blood coagulopathy. This case study describes the actions the physicians and nurses initiated to save this victim of violence. The subsequent discussion delineates methods to reduce intraoperative blood losses, blood transfusion alternatives, and technological advances in trauma resuscitation.
-
Errors resulting in adverse events in the medical care system are ubiquitous and underreported. Critical incident techniques that have been used to reduce errors in aviation have recently been applied to evaluate adverse events in the critical care arena. We report an evaluation of interrater agreement on responses to questions concerning adverse event reporting using a computer-based medical incident reporting system (MIRS). ⋯ The time required to complete a report decreased significantly from the first case to the last (p < 0.01). Overall, the MIRS was perceived as a relatively quick (< 6 minutes) and comprehensive reporting tool. The results indicate that health care providers report adverse events similarly, suggesting that the MIRS would be a useful tool in the reduction of errors (as a process improvement program) and to facilitate the continuing process of health care improvement.
-
To evaluate in war casualties with acute penetrating head injury whether the summed War Head Injury Score (WHIS) is a better predictor of mortality than either the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score or the Injury Severity Score (ISS) alone and to establish its specific applicability. ⋯ With regard to civilians, war casualties with acute penetrating head injury more often have multiple injuries. WHIS represents a new scoring system that incorporates both GCS score and ISS.