Lancet
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Comparison of arrhythmia computer and conventional monitoring in coronary-care unit.
Conventional methods of monitoring arrhythmias impose heavy demands on staff and are unreliable. On-line arrhythmia computers have been developed to overcome these problems, but there has been no critical evaluation of the functioning of such a system in a clinical setting. A comparison was made of the efficacy of two methods of monitoring in detecting arrhythmias in sixty-four patients in a coronary-care unit. ⋯ In 30 percent, treatment was delayed for several hours, and none was given in 52 percent. False alarms occurred with both systems but were more readily recognised as such in the computer-monitored patients. It is concluded that an arrhythmia computer improves the standards of arrhythmia detection, leads to quicker institution of treatment, and diminishes the demand on skilled staff.
-
Pleomorphic fringed particles bearing some resemblance to orthomyxoviruses and coronaviruses were seen in 90 percent of stools from south Indian children and adults but not in stools from neonates. This finding may be related to the abnormalities of intestinal structure and function common in this region of India.