The Journal of family practice
-
Trauma is the leading cause of nonobstetric maternal morbidity and mortality in this country. Maternal survival does not guarantee fetal survival, even in cases of apparently minor trauma. ⋯ Physicians who make obstetrics or emergency medicine part of their practice must be aware of these unique problems. Prevention of traumatic injury should remain the focus of office practice.
-
Current information about racial differences in the rate of cervical abnormalities is incomplete, and there are few data about racial differences in compliance with follow-up and treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and follow-up of abnormal Pap smear findings in white, black, and Southeast Asian women. ⋯ Southeast Asian women in this study were less likely than white and black women to comply with recommended follow-up diagnostic and treatment procedures for cervical disease.
-
Comparative Study
A comparison of labor and delivery management between nurse midwives and family physicians.
Practice associations between family physicians and nurse midwives have been suggested as a means to increase the availability of obstetric care in rural areas. No evidence exists, however, that family physicians and midwives have comparable practice styles or achieve similar outcomes in obstetric patients. ⋯ Family physicians and nurse midwives managed patients in labor similarly, but nurse midwives were more likely to achieve a vaginal delivery in primiparous women and do so without an episiotomy. Although the differences found would not interfere with a collaborative practice, subtle differences in patient management do exist. Further exploration of these differences may be helpful in understanding the impact of these differences on mixed-specialty practices.
-
Research has shown that physicians are poor predictors of patients' life-sustaining treatment preferences. Our study examined the association between three aspects of physician experience and their ability to accurately predict patients' preferences for two different life-sustaining treatments in the event of two serious medical conditions. ⋯ Increased experience with life-sustaining treatment discussions improved the physicians' abilities to accurately predict patient preferences. Although possibly resulting from small sample size, neither greater professional experience nor longer relationship with a patient improved the accuracy of physicians' predictions. Future research should examine whether discussing end-of-life issues with patients more often makes physicians more sensitive predictors of patients' life-sustaining treatment preferences.