Journal of neurosurgery
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Feb 2020
ReviewReporting trends of p values in the neurosurgical literature.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the trends in reporting of p values in the neurosurgical literature from 1990 through 2017. ⋯ Trends in reporting of p values and the distribution of p values suggest publication bias remains in the neurosurgical literature.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Feb 2020
Review Meta AnalysisFormation of intracranial de novo aneurysms and recurrence after neck clipping: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Incidence rates of de novo aneurysm formation and recurrence after clip ligation remain controversial. In this meta-analysis, the authors provide data on pooled annual incidence rates and the association of patient characteristics with time to formation of de novo aneurysms and time to recurrence after clipping. ⋯ Despite low reported annual incidence rates, the cumulative risk of 9.6%-22% for aneurysm recurrence or de novo formation 20 years after clip ligation warrants lifelong follow-up. Screening at 5, 10, and 20 years would detect 30.8% (95% CI 23.3%-37.6%), 64.2% (95% CI 55.9%-70.9%), and 95.9% (95% CI 90.9%-97.9%) of de novo aneurysms. Screening for recurrent aneurysms at 10, 15, and 20 years would detect 36.6% (95% CI 26.5%-45.4%), 65.3% (95% CI 54.7%-73.5%), and 95.1% (95% CI 85.8%-96.6%) of lesions.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Feb 2020
Review Meta AnalysisFormation of intracranial de novo aneurysms and recurrence after neck clipping: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Incidence rates of de novo aneurysm formation and recurrence after clip ligation remain controversial. In this meta-analysis, the authors provide data on pooled annual incidence rates and the association of patient characteristics with time to formation of de novo aneurysms and time to recurrence after clipping. ⋯ Despite low reported annual incidence rates, the cumulative risk of 9.6%-22% for aneurysm recurrence or de novo formation 20 years after clip ligation warrants lifelong follow-up. Screening at 5, 10, and 20 years would detect 30.8% (95% CI 23.3%-37.6%), 64.2% (95% CI 55.9%-70.9%), and 95.9% (95% CI 90.9%-97.9%) of de novo aneurysms. Screening for recurrent aneurysms at 10, 15, and 20 years would detect 36.6% (95% CI 26.5%-45.4%), 65.3% (95% CI 54.7%-73.5%), and 95.1% (95% CI 85.8%-96.6%) of lesions.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Feb 2020
ReviewEmbolization of brain arteriovenous malformations with intent to cure: a systematic review.
Endovascular embolization has been established as an adjuvant treatment strategy for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). A growing body of literature has discussed curative embolization for select lesions. The transition of endovascular embolization from an adjunctive to a definitive treatment modality remains controversial. Here, the authors reviewed the literature to assess the lesional characteristics, technical factors, and angiographic and clinical outcomes of endovascular embolization of AVMs with intent to cure. ⋯ While endovascular embolization with intent to cure can be an option for select AVMs, the reported complication rates appear to be increased compared with those in studies in which adjunctive embolization was the goal. Given the high complication rate related to a primary embolization approach, the risks and benefits of such a treatment strategy should be discussed among a multidisciplinary team. Curative embolization of AVMs should be considered an unanticipated benefit of such therapy rather than a goal.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Feb 2020
ReviewEmbolization of brain arteriovenous malformations with intent to cure: a systematic review.
Endovascular embolization has been established as an adjuvant treatment strategy for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). A growing body of literature has discussed curative embolization for select lesions. The transition of endovascular embolization from an adjunctive to a definitive treatment modality remains controversial. Here, the authors reviewed the literature to assess the lesional characteristics, technical factors, and angiographic and clinical outcomes of endovascular embolization of AVMs with intent to cure. ⋯ While endovascular embolization with intent to cure can be an option for select AVMs, the reported complication rates appear to be increased compared with those in studies in which adjunctive embolization was the goal. Given the high complication rate related to a primary embolization approach, the risks and benefits of such a treatment strategy should be discussed among a multidisciplinary team. Curative embolization of AVMs should be considered an unanticipated benefit of such therapy rather than a goal.