Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Comparison of one technique of patient-controlled postoperative analgesia with intramuscular meperidine.
We have compared analgesic requirements, perceived pain, and self-assessment of 'health locus of control' for 72 h in 88 subjects after cholecystectomy, randomized to either a standard technique of self-administration of meperidine (patient-controlled analgesia, PCA) or to intramuscular injections on demand (i.m.). Multivariate analysis revealed no statistical differences between group scores for pain (over any 24 h period) and only minor differences in total meperidine administered. ⋯ Assessment of 'health locus of control' did not show any marked changes. Analysis of patient questionnaires suggests more enthusiasm for patient-controlled analgesia, but in this study, it was difficult to clearly demonstrate any significant advantage for pain management or amount of opiate administered.
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of verbal and visual analogue scales for measuring the intensity and unpleasantness of experimental pain.
Although the multidimensional nature of pain is now well recognized, there are, nevertheless, very few quantitative tests to measure the separate dimensions of pain and little data concerning their relative sensitivity. The present study compares 2 currently available methods, verbal descriptor and visual analogue scales. ⋯ However, data derived from the verbal descriptor scales revealed that subjects rated the painful temperatures as relatively more intense than unpleasant; this difference could not be detected using the visual analogue scales. These results confirm that both visual analogue and verbal descriptor techniques successfully quantify sensory intensity and affective aspects of pain, but that verbal descriptors may provide the more sensitive tool for separating intensity and unpleasantness.
-
This project sought to determine measurement effects, topographic variability, and reliability of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) as an index of normal tenderness in the masseter and temporalis muscles of non-patient subjects. PPTs were measured using the ascending method of limits in 10 subjects. The PPT over 5 trials at each of 5 temporalis sites and 10 masseter sites was measured in 1 experiment. ⋯ The mean of the first 2 trials at each site appeared to give a better estimate of the PPT than the data from either the first trial or second trial alone from that site. In a second experiment, the PPT was measured in 2 trials at each of 4 sites over 5 sessions. The between-session PPT across multiple sessions was reliable and without differences.
-
Pain patients' retrospective reports of pain are important to physicians and other health professionals in helping to decide on future treatment plans. Unfortunately patients' memory of pain can be inaccurate and subject to overestimation. This study examined variables which influenced accuracy of remembering pain in 93 chronic pain patients. ⋯ Results showed that most patients tended to overestimate their pain intensity levels. Cervical and low back pain patients were found to be more accurate than headache and abdominal pain patients in remembering their pain. Patients who reported more emotional distress, who had conflicts at home, who were less active and who relied on medication tended to be the most inaccurate in remembering their pain.