Pain
-
Neuro-anatomical and behavioral findings suggest that spontaneous and deliberate facial expressions are regulated by separate systems. The present study examined whether spontaneous and deliberate expressions of pain could be distinguished and, if so, the dimensions on which they differ. Forty subjects were exposed to electric shocks that varied from painless to strong pain. ⋯ The intensity of deliberate expressions was related to role-playing ability. The results suggest that deliberate and spontaneous expressions of pain probably differ in intensity, topography and temporal features. They suggest that facial expressions of pain have different determinants than other forms of pain behavior.
-
The relationship between neuroticism and extraversion on the 4 major stages of pain processing, that of pain sensation intensity, pain unpleasantness, suffering, and pain behavior, were studied in 205 chronic pain patients (88 male and 117 female). Patients underwent psychological evaluation which included the Pain Experience visual analogue scales (VAS) (Price et al. 1983), NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) (Costa and McCrae 1985), and the Psychosocial Pain Inventory (PPI) (Getto and Heaton 1980). Canonical correlation was used to control for pain sensation intensity in evaluating affective dimensions of pain and to control for neuroticism in assessing effects of extraversion on different stages and dimensions of pain. ⋯ Personality factors had their greatest impact on stages 3 (suffering) and 4 (illness behavior) of pain processing. The results of multiple regression analyses indicated that life-long vulnerability to anxiety and depression is paramount in understanding the relationship between personality and suffering in chronic pain. These findings provide support for the idea that personality traits influence the ways in which people cognitively process the meanings that chronic pain holds for their life, and hence the extent to which they suffer.
-
The diagnostic value of greater occipital and supra-orbital nerve blockades in patients with cervicogenic headache, migraine without aura, and tension-type headache was investigated. The pain reduction after greater occipital nerve blockade was significantly more marked in the cervicogenic headache group than in the other categories. Moreover, pain reduction in the forehead was generally only found in the cervicogenic headache patients (77%). ⋯ This procedure did not result in distinct pain reduction. The effect obtained in cervicogenic headache is, accordingly, probably due to the local anaesthesia. The present results support the postulate that different pathogenetic factors probably are responsible for cervicogenic headache, tension-type headache, and migraine without aura.
-
Thirty-four patients having chronic idiopathic headaches participated in a long-term study comparing autogenic relaxation training alone (REL) with combinations of relaxation and electromyographic biofeedback (REL + EMG) or relaxation and temperature biofeedback (REL + TEMP). Assignment to treatment conditions was balanced on demographics and clinical characteristics, as well as headache classification according to muscle contraction or vascular headache symptomatology. ⋯ Headache activity continued to improve over the follow-up period independent of treatment condition. These data indicate that EMG biofeedback augments long-term clinical improvements in headache patients who undergo autogenic relaxation training.