Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Intraarticular morphine versus dexamethasone in chronic arthritis.
Intraarticular morphine inhibits pain after knee surgery without overt toxicity. This study examined intraarticular morphine in chronic arthritis. We undertook a randomized double-blind comparison between intraarticular morphine (3 mg), dexamethasone (4 mg) and saline (3 ml) in 44 patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis or osteoarthritis of the knee. ⋯ No patient displayed untoward side effects. Synovial leukocyte counts were lower after morphine than after saline. In conclusion, intraarticular morphine produces analgesia of similar magnitude to dexamethasone and it may have antiinflammatory actions in chronic arthritis.
-
A number of studies have examined the effects of naloxone on nitrous oxide-induced analgesia with conflicting results. In the present study the effects of a relatively high dose of naloxone was examined to determine its effects on nitrous oxide-induced analgesia, as well as on the subjective and psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide. Fourteen subjects participated in a four-session crossover trial in which they received intravenous injections of either saline or 30mg/70kg naloxone 10min into a 35min period in which they were inhaling either 100% oxygen or 30% nitrous oxide in oxygen. ⋯ Subjects reported higher pain ratings after the naloxone injection than the saline injection, but there was no evidence of naloxone reversing the analgesic effects of nitrous oxide. Similarly while naloxone also affected mood and impaired psychomotor performance, there was no evidence of naloxone reversing the effect of nitrous oxide on these measures. The results of this study call into question the role of the opioidergic system in mediating various effects of nitrous oxide in humans.
-
The objective of this study was to investigate the central processing of dynamic mechanical allodynia in patients with mononeuropathy. Regional cerebral blood flow, as an indicator of neuronal activity, was measured with positron emission tomography. Paired comparisons were made between three different states; rest, allodynia during brushing the painful skin area, and brushing of the homologous contralateral area. ⋯ This finding is consistent with previous studies suggesting attentional modulation and a central coping strategy for known and expected painful stimuli. Involvement of the medial pain system has previously been reported in patients with mononeuropathy during ongoing spontaneous pain. This study reveals a bilateral activation of the lateral pain system as well as involvement of the medial pain system during dynamic mechanical allodynia in patients with mononeuropathy.
-
The development of tolerance following repeated doses of morphine hinders the treatment of clinical pain. We have previously shown that morphine tolerance develops in neuropathic rats without cross-tolerance to a systemic kappa-opioid agonist; in the current work, using paw-pressure vocalization thresholds, we studied the antinociceptive effect of the peripherally-selective kappa (kappa)-opioid agonist, asimadoline, in both morphine-tolerant and opioid-naïve rats 2 weeks after sciatic nerve injury. In naïve rats, intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of asimadoline into the nerve-injured paw, at doses of 10, 15 and 20 (but not 30) microg, dose-dependently relieved the mechanical allodynia-like behaviour. ⋯ These results confirm that at low doses, asimadoline exerts its action only in the periphery. In morphine-tolerant rats (after 10 mg/kg s.c. , twice daily for 4 days) and naïve, saline-pretreated rats, asimadoline (15 microg, i.pl.) relieved the mechanical allodynia-like behaviour to the same extent, indicating no cross-tolerance between morphine and the peripherally-selective drug. Our findings show promise for the treatment of neuropathic pain with low doses of peripherally-selective kappa-opioids.
-
Tricyclic antidepressants and carbamazepine have become the mainstay in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Within the last decade, controlled trials have shown that numerous other drugs relieve such pain. We identified all placebo-controlled trials and calculated numbers needed to treat (NNT) to obtain one patient with more than 50% pain relief in order to compare the efficacy with the current treatments, and to search for relations between mechanism of pain and drug action. ⋯ There were no clear relations between mechanism of action of the drugs and the effect in distinct pain conditions or for single drug classes and different pain conditions. It is concluded that tricyclic antidepressants in optimal doses appear to be the most efficient treatment of neuropathic pain, but some of the other treatments may be important due to their better tolerability. Relations between drug and pain mechanisms may be elucidated by studies focusing on specific neuropathic pain phenomena such as pain paroxysms and touch-evoked pain.