Pain
-
Comparative Study
Can one predict the likely specific orofacial pain syndrome from a self-completed questionnaire?
To estimate the prevalence of orofacial pain (OFP) by specific diagnostic subgroups in the general population. Cross-sectional population study. General medical practice in South East Cheshire, UK. ⋯ The estimated prevalence in the general population of musculoligamentous/soft tissue type of OFP was 7%, dentoalveolar 7% and neurological/vascular 6%. This study has derived a statistical model to classify participants with OFP into three broad groups (musculoligamentous/soft tissue, dentoalveolar and neurological/vascular) based on questionnaire information about OFP (OFP chronicity, location and verbal descriptors of pain). It is potentially useful in large population studies of OFP, where a clinical examination is not possible, however, further validation of its performance in large populations are necessary.
-
Comparative Study
Development of tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia by intrathecally administered platelet-activating factor in mice.
Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a potent inflammatory lipid mediator in peripheral tissues. However, its role in mediation of nociception in central nervous system is unknown. In the present study, whether PAF plays some role in pain transduction in the spinal cord was studied in mice. ⋯ PAF-induced tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia disappeared in neonatally capsaicin-treated adult mice, while tactile allodynia but not thermal hyperalgesia induced by intrathecally injected alpha,beta-methylene ATP, a P2X receptor agonist, was capsaicin-insensitive. The present study demonstrated that PAF is a potent inducer of tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia at the level of the spinal cord. PAF-evoked tactile allodynia is suggested to be mediated by ATP and the following NMDA and NO cascade through capsaicin-sensitive fiber, different from exogenously injected alpha,beta-methylene ATP which is insensitive to capsaicin treatment.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Controlled trial of Internet-based treatment with telephone support for chronic back pain.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an Internet-based cognitive-behavioral intervention with telephone support for chronic back pain. Participants who met the criteria for chronic back pain (N=56) were randomly assigned to either an Internet-based cognitive behavioral self-help treatment or to a waiting-list control condition. The study period lasted 8 weeks and consisted of 1 week of self-monitoring prior to the intervention, 6 weeks of intervention, and 1 week of post-intervention assessment. ⋯ A follow-up of 3 months after treatment termination was completed in 92% (N=47) of the participants who completed the treatment intervention. Follow-up results showed that some improvement was maintained. Findings indicate that Internet-based self-help with telephone support, based on established psychological treatment methods, holds promise as an effective approach for treating disability in association with pain.
-
Comparative Study
Catastrophizing as a mediator of sex differences in pain: differential effects for daily pain versus laboratory-induced pain.
Sex differences in the experience of pain have been widely reported, with females generally reporting more frequent clinical pain and demonstrating greater pain sensitivity. However, the mechanisms underpinning such differences, while subject to intense speculation, are not well-characterized. Catastrophizing is a cognitive and affective process that relates strongly to enhanced reports of pain and that varies as a function of sex. ⋯ Women reported greater levels of catastrophizing, more recent painful symptoms, and demonstrated lower pain thresholds and tolerances for noxious heat and cold relative to men. Mediational analyses suggested that after controlling for negative mood, catastrophizing mediated the sex difference in recent daily pain but did not mediate the much larger sex differences in pain threshold and tolerance. These findings highlight the role of catastrophizing in shaping pain responses, as well as illuminating potentially important differences between experimental pain assessment and the clinical experience of pain.
-
Both children and adults with cognitive impairment (CI) have historically been excluded from research examining pain. This is unfortunate since patients with CI may be at higher risk for experiencing pain or having their pain undertreated due to the difficulty of pain assessment and communication. There are now several published reports about the general pain experience of both adult and pediatric patients with cognitive impairment. ⋯ Analgesic administration data include type and amount of opioid, type of non-opioid medication, and prescribed discharge medications. Results of this study show that children with CI undergoing surgery received less opioid in the perioperative period than children without CI. However, children with CI received comparable amounts and types of analgesics in the postoperative period as children without CI.