Pain
-
Review Meta Analysis
Meta-analysis of the relevance of the OPRM1 118A>G genetic variant for pain treatment.
Regard of functional pharmacogenetic polymorphisms may further the success of pain therapy by adopting individualized approaches. The mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) 118A>G polymorphism is a promising candidate for both opioid effects and pain because of both biological reasonability and apparent experimental and clinical evidence. We analyzed its importance for pain therapy using a meta-analytic approach to studies relating it to opioid pain therapy. ⋯ Only weak evidence of an association with less nausea (effect size, Cohen's d=-0.21, p=0.037) and of increased opioid dosage requirements (d=0.56, p=0.018) in homozygous carriers of the G allele was obtained. This indicates that despite initially promising results, available evidence of the clinical relevance of the OPRM1 118A>G polymorphism does not withhold a meta-analysis. This discourages basing personalized therapeutic concepts of pain therapy on OPRM1 118A>G genotyping at the present state of evidence.
-
Review Meta Analysis
A systematic review of adverse events in placebo groups of anti-migraine clinical trials.
In analgesic clinical trials, adverse events are reported for the painkiller under evaluation and compared with adverse events in the placebo group. Interestingly, patients who receive the placebo often report a high frequency of adverse events, but little is understood about the nature of these negative effects. In the present study, we compared the rates of adverse events reported in the placebo arms of clinical trials for three classes of anti-migraine drugs: NSAIDs, triptans and anticonvulsants. ⋯ For example, anorexia and memory difficulties, which are typical adverse events of anticonvulsants, were present only in the placebo arm of these trials. These results suggest that the adverse events in placebo arms of clinical trials of anti-migraine medications depend on the adverse events of the active medication against which the placebo is compared. These findings are in accordance with the expectation theory of placebo and nocebo effects.
-
Review Meta Analysis
A systematic review of adverse events in placebo groups of anti-migraine clinical trials.
In analgesic clinical trials, adverse events are reported for the painkiller under evaluation and compared with adverse events in the placebo group. Interestingly, patients who receive the placebo often report a high frequency of adverse events, but little is understood about the nature of these negative effects. In the present study, we compared the rates of adverse events reported in the placebo arms of clinical trials for three classes of anti-migraine drugs: NSAIDs, triptans and anticonvulsants. ⋯ For example, anorexia and memory difficulties, which are typical adverse events of anticonvulsants, were present only in the placebo arm of these trials. These results suggest that the adverse events in placebo arms of clinical trials of anti-migraine medications depend on the adverse events of the active medication against which the placebo is compared. These findings are in accordance with the expectation theory of placebo and nocebo effects.
-
An essential component of the interpretation of results of randomized clinical trials of treatments for chronic pain involves the determination of their clinical importance or meaningfulness. This involves two distinct processes--interpreting the clinical importance of individual patient improvements and the clinical importance of group differences--which are frequently misunderstood. In this article, we first describe the essential differences between the interpretation of the clinical importance of patient improvements and of group differences. ⋯ The clinical importance of individual patient improvements can be determined by assessing what patients themselves consider meaningful improvement using well-described methods. In contrast, the clinical meaningfulness of group differences must be determined by a multi-factorial evaluation of the benefits and risks of the treatment and of other available treatments for the condition in light of the primary goals of therapy. Such determinations must be conducted on a case-by-case basis, and are ideally informed by patients and their significant others, clinicians, researchers, statisticians, and representatives of society at large.