European journal of pediatrics
-
The complexity and high cost of neonatal and pediatric intensive care has generated increasing interest in developing measures to quantify the severity of patient illness. While these indices may help improve health care quality and benchmark mortality across hospitals, comprehensive understanding of the purpose and the factors that influenced the performance of risk stratification indices is important so that they can be compared fairly and used most appropriately. In this review, we examined 19 indices of risk stratification used to predict mortality in critically ill children and critically analyzed their design, limitations, and purposes. Some pediatric and neonatal models appear well-suited for institutional benchmarking purposes, with relatively brief data acquisition times, limited potential for treatment-related bias, and reliance on diagnostic variables that permit adjustment for case mix. Other models are more suitable for use in clinical trials, as they rely on physiologic variables collected over an extended period, to better capture the interaction between organ systems function and specific therapeutic interventions in acutely ill patients. Irrespective of their clinical or research applications, risk stratification indices must be periodically recalibrated to adjust for changes in clinical practice in order to remain valid outcome predictors in pediatric intensive care units. Longitudinal auditing, education, training, and guidelines development are also critical to ensure fidelity and reproducibility in data reporting. ⋯ Risk stratification indices are valid tools to describe intensive care unit population and explain differences in mortality.
-
Anatomical face mask with an air cushion rim might be placed accidentally in a false orientation on the newborn's face or filled with various amounts of air during neonatal resuscitation. Both false orientation as well as variable filling may reduce a tight seal and therefore hamper effective positive pressure ventilation (PPV). We aimed to measure the influence of mask type and mask position on the effectiveness of PPV. Twenty neonatal staff members delivered PPV to a modified, leak-free manikin. Resuscitation parameters were recorded using a self-inflatable bag PPV with an Intersurgical anatomical air cushion rim face mask (IS) and a size 0/1 Laerdal round face mask. Three different positions of the IS were tested: correct position, 90° and 180° rotation in reference to the midline of the face. IS masks in each correct position on the face but with different inflation of the air cushion (empty, 10, 20 and 30 mL). Mask leak was similar with mask rotation to either 90° or 180° but significantly increased from 27 (13-73) % with an adequate filled IS mask compared to 52 (16-83) % with an emptied air cushion rim. ⋯ Anatomical-shaped face mask had similar mask leaks compared to round face mask. A wrongly positioned anatomical-shaped mask does not influence mask leak. Mask leak significantly increased once the air cushion rim was empty, which may cause failure in mask PPV.
-
Despite the paucity of evidence, the practice of weaning nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is widespread. However, the most clinically effective non-invasive ventilatory support strategy remains to be determined. We compared the outcome of very premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome treated with a combination of NCPAP and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) versus NCPAP and low-flow nasal cannula (LFNC). Between 2004 and 2008, patients ≤28 weeks of gestation and <1,250 g of birth weight were treated with NCPAP + HHFNC or NCPAP + LFNC. Their respiratory and non-respiratory outcome including cost-effectiveness was compared after matching for antenatal steroid doses, mode of delivery, birth plurality, gestational age, birth weight, gender, surfactant doses, length of mechanical ventilation and clinical risk index for babies-II (CRIB-II) score. Thirty-nine infants received HHFNC + NCPAP, and 40 received NCPAP + LFNC. Median gestational age and birth weight were 27 weeks and 930 g and 27 weeks and 980 g, respectively. The total number of NCPAP days was significantly reduced by 50 % in the HHFNC group. Thirteen percent of the patients on NCPAP suffered from nasal bridge lesions compared to none on HHFNC. Respiratory and non-respiratory outcome was not significantly different otherwise. Combination of NCPAP and HHFNC reduced costs by 33 %. ⋯ HHFNC shortens NCPAP time without increasing overall length of non-invasive respiratory support in very preterm infants. Unlike NCPAP, HHFNC does not seem to increase the risk of nasal trauma and appears to improve cost-effectiveness whilst producing otherwise equal respiratory and non-respiratory outcomes.