European journal of pediatrics
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Two new chest compression methods might challenge the standard in a simulated infant model.
Paediatric cardiorespiratory arrest is a rare event that requires a fast, quality intervention. High-quality chest compressions are an essential prognostic factor. The aim of this prospective, randomized and crossover study in infant manikin 2-min cardiorespiratory resuscitation scenario is to quantitatively compare the quality of the currently recommended method in infants (two-thumb-encircling hand techniques) with two new methods (the new two-thumb and the knocking-fingers techniques) using a 15:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio. ⋯ Conclusion: In an infant manikin, professionals are able to perform chest compressions with the new techniques with similar quality to that obtained with the standard method. What is Known: • Quality chest compressions are an essential prognostic factor in paediatric cardiorespiratory arrest. • It has been reported poor results when studied cardiorespiratory resuscitation quality in infants applying the recommended methods. What is New: • In a simulated scenario, quality of chest compressions performed with two new techniques (nTTT and KF) is similar to that obtained with the currently recommended method (TTHT).
-
Urinary tract infections, the most common severe bacterial infections in young infants, may be associated with co-existing meningitis. There is no consensus on when to perform a lumbar puncture in these infants. Our aim was to quantify the frequency of co-existing bacterial meningitis in febrile young infants acutely assessed for presumed urinary tract infections. ⋯ A case by case assessment should be made in infants not meeting low-risk criteria. Trial registration: CRD42018105339 What is known: • When caring for febrile infants ≤ 3 months with urinary tract infections, clinicians may have uncertainty on whether to perform a lumbar puncture (LP) for possible co-existing meningitis What is new: • An up-to-date systematic review of 20 studies found the frequency of co-existing meningitis in this population to be between 0 and 2.1% • Despite limited data, an LP may not be indicated in infants meeting low-risk criteria (being well-appearing, age > 21 days, procalcitonin ≤ 0.5 ng/ml, C reactive protein ≤ 20 mg/L). Ill-appearance and neonatal age appear to be significant risk factors of co-existing meningitis.
-
Observational Study
Use of high-flow nasal cannula in infants with viral bronchiolitis outside pediatric intensive care units.
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is frequently used in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis outside pediatric intensive care units (PICU). A structured questionnaire was sent out to pediatricians of all public French hospitals with pediatric emergency and/or general pediatric departments on their use of HFNC outside PICU (department using HFNC, number of available devices, monitoring, criteria for initiating or stopping HFNC, and personal comments on HFNC). Of the 166 eligible hospitals, 135 answered (96 general and 39 university hospitals; 81.3%), for a total of 217 answering pediatricians. ⋯ Pediatricians had a positive opinion of HFNC and were willing to extend its use to other diseases. Conclusion: Use of HFNC outside PICU in infants with acute bronchiolitis is now usual, but urgently requires guidelines. What is Known: • Acute viral bronchiolitis treatment is only supportive • High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a respiratory support accumulating convincing clinical evidence in bronchiolitis • This latter treatment is usually proposed in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) What is New: • HFNC are increasingly used outside PICU in bronchiolitis, particularly, in general hospitals and in pediatric general departments • Pediatricians are enthusiastic about this device, but validated criteria for initiation and withdrawal are lacking • Guidelines for the use of HFNC outside PICU are urgently required.
-
Comparative Study
Risk stratification to improve Pediatric Early Warning Systems: it is all about the context.
Early recognition of critically ill patients is of paramount importance to reduce pediatric mortality and morbidity. We created a risk stratification system combining vital parameters and predefined risk factors aimed at reducing the risk of unrecognized clinical deterioration compared with conventional Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS). This single-center retrospective case cohort study included infants (gestational age ≥ 37 weeks) to adolescents (aged <18 years) with unplanned pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission between April 01, 2014, and February 28, 2018. ⋯ Conclusion: Risk stratification seems advantageous for a faster detection of clinical deterioration, providing opportunity for earlier intervention. What is Known: • Prompt detection of clinical deterioration is of essential importance to reduce morbidity and mortality. • Conventional Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) have limited sensitivity and a short window of detection of 1 to 2 h. What is New: • Risk stratification based on context factors allows earlier identification of patients at risk, well before deviation of vital signs. • Risk stratification combined with continuous monitoring of deteriorating trends in vital signs could lead to the development of next-generation warning systems achieving true patient safety.