Medical education
-
The health professions education (HPE) literature is replete with recommendations for how educators should adapt practices to the needs of generations of learners using generation theory to bridge perceived differences between learners and educators. Yet the evidence supporting the application of generation theory in HPE has not been critically examined. If unsubstantiated, these applications may perpetuate biases towards learners they are intended to support. ⋯ Generational archetypes such as that of the "Millennial learner" are myths that perpetuate unfounded generalisations about cohorts, reinforce power differentials between age groups, and minimise the unique needs of individuals. To individualise and strengthen teaching practices in HPE, we recommend adopting "generational humility" as a means to more purposefully address the dynamic social, cultural and historical influences that shape individuals within each generation of learners.
-
Myth busting engages scholars in the critical examination of commonly accepted but poorly evidenced claims with the goal of instilling quality and trust in knowledge making. The debunking of such knowledge "myths" and associated misguided practices purportedly serves to avert resources and attention from wasteful and dangerous scholarship. We address the myth that "all myths in medical education deserve to be busted". ⋯ Our analysis makes evident that myth busting disrupts, renegotiates and reconstitutes socio-epistemic relationships rather than simply correcting falsehoods. We also argue that myths play important and inescapable roles in the social practice of medical education and the negotiation of values, and in constructing the conditions for group change and transformation. Imperatives related to humanism, compassion and patient engagement offer a healthy humanising counter-mythologising that we suggest must survive any contemporary myth-busting endeavour aimed at improving medical education practice.