Spine
-
Review Comparative Study
The Cell Saver in adult lumbar fusion surgery: a cost-benefit outcomes study.
Review of efficacy of Cell Saver in a nonrandomized group of patients undergoing lumbar fusion. ⋯ There was a 38% recovery rate of blood using the Cell Saver. This resulted in a decreased need for postoperative transfusion in the study group (1 U to 36% of patients) relative to the control group (1 U to 50% of patients). Significant predictors for surgery time were the number of levels fused (P < 0.0001), patient's weight (P = 0.0030), and use of Cell Saver (P = 0.0472). Significant indicators of blood loss were the number of levels fused (P < 0.0001) and surgical time (P = 0.0304). The average cost for blood-related charges in the Cell Saver group was 512 dollars versus 270 dollars per patient in the control group. CONCLUSIONS.: While the Cell Saver group did require fewer postoperative transfusions, the difference was not as much as expected. In elective fusions for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine, blood requirements can usually be satisfied with predonation of autologous blood. With contemporary practices of predonation, the use of the Cell Saver appears to be neither necessary nor cost-effective during most elective lumbar fusions.
-
Review Case Reports Comparative Study
Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF.
A retrospective study of 87 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) at L4-L5 for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis. ⋯ 1) There was no correlation between radiologic degeneration of cranial adjacent segment and clinical results. 2) Risk factors for postoperative radiologic degeneration could not be detected in terms of each preoperative radiologic factor. 3) Coexistence of horizontalization of the lamina at L3 and facet tropism at L3-L4 may be one of the risk factors for neurologic deterioration resulting from accelerated L3-L4 degenerative change after L4-L5 PLIF.
-
Our systematic review of randomized trials assessed whether manipulation and mobilization relieve pain or improve function/disability, patient satisfaction, and global perceived effect in adults with mechanical neck disorders. ⋯ Mobilization and/or manipulation when used with exercise are beneficial for persistent mechanical neck disorders with or without headache. Done alone, manipulation and/or mobilization were not beneficial; when compared to one another, neither was superior. There was insufficient evidence available to draw conclusions for neck disorder with radicular findings. Factorial design would help determine the active agent(s) within a treatment mix.
-
Our systematic review of randomized trials assessed whether manipulation and mobilization relieve pain or improve function/disability, patient satisfaction, and global perceived effect in adults with mechanical neck disorders. ⋯ Mobilization and/or manipulation when used with exercise are beneficial for persistent mechanical neck disorders with or without headache. Done alone, manipulation and/or mobilization were not beneficial; when compared to one another, neither was superior. There was insufficient evidence available to draw conclusions for neck disorder with radicular findings. Factorial design would help determine the active agent(s) within a treatment mix.
-
A retrospective review with clinical and radiologic assessment was conducted. ⋯ Twenty-three patients with tuberculosis of the lower lumbar spine underwent posterior instrumentation with laminar hooks and anterior interbody arthrodesis by a single surgeon. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with preoperative and postoperative questionnaires, and the radiographs were independently analyzed with respect to fusion status and sagittal angle. RESULTS.: The mean follow-up period was 28.7 months (range, 24-39 months). The average preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up sagittal angles were 2.7 degrees, -14.1 degrees, and -11.5 degrees, respectively. There was a mean reduction of 16.7 degrees (range, 9 degrees-23 degrees) after surgery. Two patients had a correction loss more than 5 degrees during the follow-up period. Bony fusion was obtained in all patients. There was no recurrence of the disease. CONCLUSION.: This technique appears to be effective in stabilizing the vertebrae, restoring lordosis, achieving a solid fusion, and improving clinical outcome without sacrificing additional motion segments.