Spine
-
A literature review and the authors' clinical experience for the indication of fusion in the degenerative lumbar and cervical spine is provided. ⋯ Lumbar and cervical fusion in the degenerative spine is frequently performed. Certain criteria have been established when a fusion should be considered. However, even these are not universally accepted. Strict prospective studies are needed to determine when a fusion of the degenerative, cervical, and lumbar spine is indicated. Patients with severe radicular pain may be considered for surgery after a comprehensive trial of conservative management. Fusion is usually necessary after a cervical discectomy, especially when spondylosis or osteophytic compression is present. Lumbar fusion is rarely indicated for routine discectomy. In patients with mechanical back or neck pain, surgery should only be considered after conservative measures have been exhausted and a radiographic abnormality is present at the symptomatic level, perhaps with pain concordant with discographic findings. Careful patient selection is the key to obtaining favorable surgical outcomes. In many cases, the goal may be a return to functionality rather than achieving a completely asymptomatic state.
-
Review article. ⋯ Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that minimally invasive lumbar fusion techniques will benefit patients with spinal disorders.
-
Prospective inception cohort. ⋯ There is evidence for the validity of a single bothersomeness question as a measure of LBP severity. It has the potential to provide a practical standard scheme for classifying patients with LBP in clinical practice. However, further work is needed to clarify its usefulness in a clinical setting.
-
Sequential study of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine for assessing the level of termination of the conus medullaris (CMT) and thecal sac (TST). ⋯ The CMT and TST displayed a wide range of values in our study. We detected small but systematic influences of gender and age on CMT and of age on TST, as well as a positive correlation between CMT and TST. These effects are small in amplitude, but they met all the criteria for statistical significance and have practical value for clinicians, as well as theoretical value for the medical and biologic community.
-
We propose that chronic spondylolytic defects at L5 are influenced by insufficient differential mediolateral distances between inferior articular facets of L4 and the superior facets of S1, which results in these structures impinging on adjacent sides of the par interarticularis during hyperlordosis. Individuals with adequate increase in interfacet distances from L4 through S1 are less likely to develop or maintain defects. ⋯ Spondylolysis is the direct result of contact pressures on both sides of the pars interarticularis resulting from inadequate separation between the inferior articular processes of L4 and the superior articular facets of S1. Individuals lacking sufficient increase in transverse interfacet dimensions in their lumbar columns are at greater risk of developing and maintaining spondylolytic defects.