Spine
-
A prospective patient's database operated on a cauda equina syndrome (CES). ⋯ CES remains a profound disabling syndrome with poor functional prognosis: in the long run, few patients go back to work. The main prognosis factors established in our series regarded the initial severity of deficits whether motor or sphincteral. Early or later surgical cauda equina decompression did not show to represent a prognosis factor for functional recovery.Level of Evidence: 4.
-
Retrospective study of a cohort of consecutive patients. ⋯ Because of their significantly high risk for PJK, in patients with ASD and prone ΔTK >11.5° and supine ΔTK >18.5°, the upper-thoracic spine should be considered for UIV.Level of Evidence: 3.
-
Multicenter Study
Surgical Factors and Treatment Severity for Perioperative Complications Predict Hospital Length of Stay in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.
Retrospective review of prospectively collected multicenter registry data. ⋯ Careful selection of surgical factors may help reduce hospital LOS following surgery for ASD. Classification of complications by treatment severity can help surgeons better understand and predict the implications of complications, in turn assisting with surgical planning and patient counseling.Level of Evidence: 4.
-
A retrospective analysis of a prospective, non-randomized cohort dataset. ⋯ The volume loss of skeletal muscle, including lumbar PVM, and ectopic fat infiltration into the PVM, may cause the lumbo-pelvic deformity.Level of Evidence: 3.
-
Retrospective review of prospective longitudinal data. ⋯ Patients with spinal metastases and independent ambulatory function have an HRQL similar to patients with primary cancers and no spinal involvement. Loss of ambulatory ability leads to a 22% decrease in HRQL for ambulation with assistance and an 82% reduction among nonambulators. Given prior studies demonstrate superior maintenance of ambulatory function with surgery for spinal metastases, our results support surgical consideration to the extent that it is clinically warranted.Level of Evidence: 3.