Spine
-
Prospective cohort study. ⋯ Preoperative CSM patients showed significant alterations in spatiotemporal gait parameters and postural stability compared with controls, consistent with prior literature. Likewise, angular momentum analysis demonstrates that these patients have globally increased body excursion to maintain dynamic balance.Level of Evidence: 3.
-
Retrospective cohort study. ⋯ MI-PCF is a safe and effective alternative to ACDF in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, demonstrating substantial benefit. After final follow-up, MI-PCF demonstrated superior improvements in Visual Analog Scale scores, without increased complication or revision rates.Level of Evidence: 3.
-
Observational Study
External Validation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) Test after Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
Prospective observational cohort study. ⋯ This study confirms the ordinally reported TUG MCID values in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar. A TUG test time change of 2.1 seconds (or TUG z score change of 1.5) indicates an objective and clinically meaningful change in functional status. This report facilitates the interpretation of TUG test results in clinical routine as well as in research.Level of Evidence: 3.
-
In vivo study using immunostaining and immunoblot analysis. ⋯ During the disc degeneration process, BMDMs were observed mainly around the endplate and outside area of the annulus fibrosus, with few in the inside area of annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus. Compared to other IVD area, macrophage polarity and cytokine expression is concomitantly M2-dominant in endplate. Increased hematogenous M2-phenotype macrophages in endplate with progression of IVD degeneration could enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of disc degeneration.Level of Evidence: N/A.
-
Retrospective questionnaire analysis. ⋯ Patients who received a MIS approach more frequently sought out their surgeons, were more confident in their procedure, and reported less perceived disadvantages following their surgery compared with the open surgery cohort. Both cohorts would prefer MIS surgery in the future. Overall, patients have positive perceptions of MIS surgery.Level of Evidence: 3.