Spine
-
Retrospective longitudinal study. ⋯ Level of Evidence: NA.
-
Cross-sectional prospective study. ⋯ Level of Evidence: NA.
-
Prospective study. ⋯ Both methods are effective in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Modified MIS-TLIF is a safe and effective procedure that can significantly reduce the occurrence of injury to the dura and nerve root during decompression and the interbody fusion procedure.Level of Evidence: 3.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The Influence of Simulated Low Speed Vehicle Impacts and Posture on Passive Intervertebral Mechanics.
An in vitro biomechanics investigation exposing porcine functional spinal units (FSUs) to sudden impact loading although in a flexed, neutral, or extended posture. ⋯ Functional spinal units exposed to the highest severity impact (11 g) had significant neutral zone changes, with increases in joint laxity in flexion-extension and anterior-posterior shear and decreased stiffness, suggesting that soft tissue injury may have occurred. Despite observed main effects of impact severity, no influence of posture was observed.Level of Evidence: N/A.
-
Fourteen cadaveric specimens were separated into two groups: (1) L3 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or (2) lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). A 2-rod configuration (2R) was compared with two supplemental rod configurations: 4-rod (4R) with accessory rods (ARs) using connectors or 4R with satellite rods (SRs) without connectors. ⋯ Both supplemental rod configurations reduced motion in both groups. Constructs with the SR configuration increased the primary rod strain and the sacral screw bending moment compared with AR constructs, which can share strain. Deep-seated SRs, which have become increasingly popular, may be more vulnerable to failure than ARs. LLIF provided more stability in sagittal plane. Protective effect of supplemental rods on rod strain was more effective with TLIF.Level of Evidence: NA.