World journal of surgery
-
World journal of surgery · Sep 2002
Minimal blood loss in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
The objective of this study was to evaluate blood loss in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Blood loss and operating time were evaluated in a series of 197 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy by a two-surgeon team. The patients were positioned supine with the table flexed and the patient in about 35 degrees Trendelenburg position. ⋯ Whereas epidural anesthesia decreased blood loss by a modest 27%, intraoperative blood pressure, bilateral hypogastric artery clamping, and nerve sparing had little or no significant effect. Patient position and the surgical skill of a two-man team can virtually eliminate the risk of blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy. There is thus no need always to resort to other procedures or to preoperative autologous blood donation.
-
The number of times an article is cited in scientific journals reflects its impact on a specific biomedical field or specialty and reflects the impact of the authors' creativity. Our objective was to identify and analyze the characteristics of the 100 most frequently cited articles published in journals dedicated to general surgery and its close subspecialties. Using the database (1945-1995) of the Science Citation Index of the Institute for Scientific Information, 1500 articles cited 100 times and more were identified and the top 100 articles selected for further analysis. ⋯ This list of the top-cited papers identifies seminal contributions and their originators, facilitating the understanding and discourse of modern surgical history and offering surgeons hints about what makes a contribution a "top-cited classic." To produce such a "classic" the surgeon and his or her group must come up with a clinical or nonclinical innovation, observation, or discovery that has a long-standing effect on the way we practice-be it operative or nonoperative. Based on our findings, to be well cited such a contribution should be published in the English language in a high-impact journal. Moreover, it is more likely to resonant loudly if it originates from a North American or British "ivory tower."