International orthopaedics
-
Review Comparative Study
Comparison of the efficacy of a distal clavicular locking plate versus a clavicular hook plate in the treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures and a systematic literature review.
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare and review the clinical outcomes between the distal clavicular locking plate and clavicular hook plates in the treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures; moreover, the relevant literature of the two fixation methods was reviewed systematically to identify the non-union, complications, or functional scores, according to the treatment methods and determine which treatment method is better. ⋯ Both distal clavicular locking plate and clavicular hook plate achieved good results in the treatment of unstable distal clavicle fractures; however, internal fixation with a distal clavicular locking plate had greater ability to return to their previous work after surgery in three months and fewer complications than the clavicular hook plate.
-
We evaluated the potential advantages of short-segment fixation of certain anterior acetabular fracture patterns through a limited ilioinguinal approach. ⋯ Short-segment fixation through a limited ilioinguinal approach is a safe and effective alternative for treating certain patterns of anterior acetabular fractures. Decreased blood loss and shorter operative time with less soft tissue dissection are the main advantages of this approach.
-
This clinical study was performed to establish the incidence of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after shoulder surgery as the incidence of venous thrombo-embolism complicating shoulder surgery is poorly described in literature. ⋯ Recent studies suggest that DVT prevalence following shoulder arthroplasty is as high as 13 %. In our study we examined occurrence of symptomatic VTE only. According to our results the prevalence of symptomatic DVT following shoulder surgery is 0.26 %, symptomatic PE 0.17 % and combined prevalence of VTE is 0.43 %. We would advise careful thought about the risk of thrombosis and use mechanical prophylaxis in shoulder surgery, especially for longer procedures. We would not recommend routine pharmacological prophylaxis unless there are additional risk factors.