Clinical therapeutics
-
Clinical therapeutics · Jun 2010
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyRelative oral bioavailability of morphine and naltrexone derived from crushed morphine sulfate and naltrexone hydrochloride extended-release capsules versus intact product and versus naltrexone solution: a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, three-way crossover trial in healthy volunteers.
Morphine sulfate/sequestered naltrexone hydrochloride (HCl) (MS-sNT) extended-release fixed-dose combination capsules, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2009 for chronic moderate to severe pain, contain extended-release morphine pellets with a sequestered core of the opioid antagonist naltrexone. MS-sNT was designed so that if the product is tampered with by crushing, the naltrexone becomes bioavailable to mitigate morphine-induced subjective effects, rendering the product less attractive for tampering. ⋯ In this single-dose study, when pellets from MS-sNT were crushed, naltrexone appeared to be completely released and available to mitigate morphine-induced effects. When MS-sNT was administered whole, morphine was released in an extended-release fashion while naltrexone remained sequestered.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Jun 2010
ReviewTreatment of hypervolemic or euvolemic hyponatremia associated with heart failure, cirrhosis, or the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone with tolvaptan: a clinical review.
Tolvaptan is an oral nonpeptide selective vasopressin V(2)-receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of clinically relevant hypervolemic or euvolemic hyponatremia associated with heart failure, cirrhosis, or syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone. ⋯ Based on findings from clinical trials to date, tolvaptan is effective for the correction of hyponatremia but has not been associated with significant improvements in mortality in patients with heart failure compared with placebo, and its utility in the treatment of ADPKD in humans remains to be determined.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Jun 2010
Patient characteristics and prescription fill patterns for allergic rhinitis medications, with a focus on montelukast, in a commercially insured population.
Allergic rhinitis (AR), also known as hay fever, is caused by an overreaction of the immune system to airborne allergens. AR is a substantial cause of widespread morbidity, medical treatment costs, and reduced productivity at work and school. ⋯ Half of the patients identified with AR did not fill a prescription for an AR medication. Among those patients with AR-related prescription drug fills, most were prescribed a single index pharmacotherapy and did not receive additional AR medications within 30 days of the index date. The use of montelukast was limited and was more commonly prescribed to children and adults with AR whose condition was not controlled with other AR medications.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Jun 2010
ReviewReview of the efficacy and tolerability of the diclofenac epolamine topical patch 1.3% in patients with acute pain due to soft tissue injuries.
The diclofenac epolamine topical patch 1.3% (DETP) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in January 2007 for the treatment of soft tissue injuries such as strains, sprains, and contusions, although it has been available for many years in >40 countries worldwide. ⋯ Based on data from clinical studies and postmarketing experience, the DETP was associated with significant pain relief in patients with soft tissue injuries, with good tolerability.
-
Clinical therapeutics · Jun 2010
Randomized Controlled TrialPharmacokinetic comparison of two nicotine transdermal systems, a 21-mg/24-hour patch and a 25-mg/16-hour patch: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way crossover study in adult smokers.
A comparison of the 21-mg NiQuitin patch with other marketed nicotine patches reported significant differences in pharmacokinetic profiles, even among patches of the identical labeled dose strength. The 25-mg Nicorette Invisi patch became available in the United Kingdom at the end of 2008. No published studies have directly compared the pharmacokinetic profile of this new patch with that of the 21-mg NiQuitin patch. ⋯ In this single-dose study in adult smokers, the 21-mg patch was associated with significantly greater nicotine exposure compared with the 25-mg patch. The 21-mg patch provided a maximal nicotine concentration faster than did the 25-mg patch.