The American journal of medicine
-
Public interest in herbal medicines has generated an increasing number of trials evaluating their efficacy. Trials with poor methodologic quality have exaggerated estimates of treatment effect, and incomplete reporting of trials causes difficulties in assessing trial methodologic quality. The objective of this project was to examine the quality of reporting of randomized controlled intervention trials of herbal medicine. ⋯ Important methodologic components of randomized controlled trials of herbal medicines are incompletely reported including allocation concealment, method used to generate the allocation sequence, and whether an intention-to-treat analysis was used. Also, key information unique to these trials may be missing, such as percentage of active constituents and type or form of the herbal medicine preparation. We suggest trialists consult a recent extension of the Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials statement specific to herbal medicine trials when designing and reporting randomized controlled intervention trials of herbal medicines.
-
Review
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of upper GI bleeding: confusion or confounding?
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) represent a relatively new class of antidepressants. Several studies have reported bleeding disorders associated with the use of SSRIs, which are considered the result of a decrease in platelet serotonin leading to a defect in platelet aggregation. To what extent the use of SSRIs increases the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding is unclear. ⋯ Only a few epidemiology studies have investigated the association between SSRIs and UGIB. They provide weak evidence to support the hypothesis of a link between SSRIs and UGIB at a population level. Available evidence shows that concurrent use of NSAIDs or aspirin with SSRIs greatly increases the risk of UGIB. The preventive strategy should be considered in those SSRI users at high risk, especially the elderly or those with a history of UGIB and taking nonselective NSAIDs or aspirin.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events of low-dose aspirin and clopidogrel in randomized controlled trials.
We performed a systematic review to define the relative and absolute risk of clinically relevant adverse events with the antiplatelet agents, aspirin and clopidogrel. ⋯ Low-dose aspirin increases the risk of major bleeding by approximately 70%, but the absolute increase is modest: 769 patients (95% CI, 500-1250) need to be treated with aspirin to cause one additional major bleeding episode annually. Compared with clopidogrel, aspirin increases the risk of GI bleeding but not other bleeding; however, 883 patients (95% CI, 357-infinity) would need to be treated with clopidogrel versus aspirin to prevent one major GI bleeding episode annually at a cost of over 1 million dollars.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events of low-dose aspirin and clopidogrel in randomized controlled trials.
We performed a systematic review to define the relative and absolute risk of clinically relevant adverse events with the antiplatelet agents, aspirin and clopidogrel. ⋯ Low-dose aspirin increases the risk of major bleeding by approximately 70%, but the absolute increase is modest: 769 patients (95% CI, 500-1250) need to be treated with aspirin to cause one additional major bleeding episode annually. Compared with clopidogrel, aspirin increases the risk of GI bleeding but not other bleeding; however, 883 patients (95% CI, 357-infinity) would need to be treated with clopidogrel versus aspirin to prevent one major GI bleeding episode annually at a cost of over 1 million dollars.
-
Consequences of hyponatremia are generally mild and remain unnoticed by both physician and patient. When water restriction, usually prescribed to avoid water intoxication, fails to normalize serum sodium values, clinicians will tolerate mild stable hyponatremia (especially when serum sodium is >125 mEq/L [1 mEq/L = 1 mmol/L]). In a recent study, we observed that mild chronic hyponatremia contributes to an increased rate of falls, probably due to impairment of attention, posture, and gait mechanisms. ⋯ In another series of 122 consecutive patients hospitalized from the emergency room with mild hyponatremia, approximately 21% were admitted for falls. After controlling for age, sex, and other known risk factors for falls, the adjusted odds ratio for falls in patients with hyponatremia was 67, compared with a control group. These data show that the concept of asymptomatic hyponatremia does not withstand a detailed epidemiologic analysis of falls or of sensitive posture, gait, and attention tests.