Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
-
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. · Jan 1996
Comparative StudyThe significance of the sequence of administration of topotecan and etoposide.
Often the best method of integrating chemotherapeutic agents is unknown. Recently there has been interest in the use of combinations of the topoisomerase II inhibitors and the topoisomerase I inhibitors as these agents have shown individual activity in malignancies such as non-small-cell lung cancer. This study examined the interaction of the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide with the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan (Tpt) in V79 cells (hamster lung fibroblast cells) to determine the optimal method of delivering these agents. ⋯ These results suggest that maximum synergy occurs for the delivery of etoposide following Tpt exposure (compared to the opposite sequence) and these findings may have important clinical implications.
-
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. · Jan 1996
Interstitial delivery of carboplatin via biodegradable polymers is effective against experimental glioma in the rat.
Carboplatin has shown promise experimentally as an antineoplastic agent against both primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors and several solid tumors that frequently metastasize to the brain. Unfortunately, carboplatin is limited in its clinical use for tumors in the CNS by systemic toxicity and poor penetration through the blood brain barrier. Recent advances in polymer technology have made feasible the intracranial implantation of a biodegradable polymer capable of local sustained delivery of chemotherapy for brain neoplasms. This study assessed the toxicity and efficacy of carboplatin delivered from intracranial sustained release polymers in the treatment of experimental gliomas in rodents. ⋯ Carboplatin can be safely delivered intracranially by biodegradable sustained- release polymers. This treatment improves survival in rodents with experimental gliomas, with locally delivered carboplatin being more effective than systemic carboplatin.
-
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA randomized, double-blind comparison of single-dose and divided multiple-dose dolasetron for cisplatin-induced emesis.
Intravenous dolasetron has been shown to be an effective antiemetic agent in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Previous studies have suggested that 1.8 mg/kg is an optimal dose for achieving control of emesis and nausea. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single intravenous (IV) dose of dolasetron with an equal divided multiple dose. ⋯ single-dose dolasetron was well tolerated and effectively controlled emesis and nausea in patients who received highly emetogenic, high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. The greater antiemetic efficacy of a single prophylactic dose of dolasetron offers both convenience and potential cost savings, compared with a multiple-dose schedule of administration.
-
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. · Jan 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of the efficacy of tropisetron versus a metoclopramide cocktail based on the intensity of cisplatin-induced emesis.
Cisplatin-induced emesis is one of the most feared side effects in cancer treatment. High-dose metoclopramide may prevent only 30-40% of cases of acute emesis. Investigations to test the efficacy of new antiemetics are mandatory. ⋯ A tendency for tropisetron preference was observed. Tropisetron is more effective than the metoclopramide cocktail in the control of chemotherapy-induced vomiting within 8 h of the implementation of cisplatin and in the control of nausea on the 1st day. To improve the control of chemotherapy-induced emesis, further investigations on the additional tropisetron dosing at 8 h after cisplatin infusion or the combination use of tropisetron and other antiemetics by a continuous 4 h period of observation and comparison are mandatory.
-
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. · Jan 1996
ReviewPromising new agents in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
A number of new drugs and drug classes have recently become available for clinical testing which demonstrate significant antitumor activity in non-small cell lung cancer. The preclinical rationale, mechanism of action, toxicity profile and results of early trials of paclitaxel, docetaxel, edatrexate, CPT-11, topotecan, vinorelbine and gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer are reviewed.