Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
-
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · Nov 2011
Randomized Controlled TrialPhase III randomized, double-blind study comparing single-dose intravenous peramivir with oral oseltamivir in patients with seasonal influenza virus infection.
Antiviral medications with activity against influenza viruses are important in controlling influenza. We compared intravenous peramivir, a potent neuraminidase inhibitor, with oseltamivir in patients with seasonal influenza virus infection. In a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy randomized controlled study, patients aged ≥ 20 years with influenza A or B virus infection were randomly assigned to receive either a single intravenous infusion of peramivir (300 or 600 mg) or oral administration of oseltamivir (75 mg twice a day [b.i.d.] for 5 days). ⋯ Both peramivir groups were noninferior to the oseltamivir group (97.5% CI, <1.170). The overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was significantly lower in the 300-mg-peramivir group, but the incidence of severe reactions in either peramivir group was not different from that in the oseltamivir group. Thus, a single intravenous dose of peramivir may be an alternative to a 5-day oral dose of oseltamivir for patients with seasonal influenza virus infection.
-
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · Nov 2011
Randomized Controlled TrialComparative susceptibilities to fidaxomicin (OPT-80) of isolates collected at baseline, recurrence, and failure from patients in two phase III trials of fidaxomicin against Clostridium difficile infection.
A 10-day course of oral fidaxomicin (200 mg twice a day [b.i.d.]), a potent new macrocyclic drug, was compared to vancomycin (125 mg four times a day [q.i.d.]) in 1,164 adults (1,105 in the modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population) with Clostridium difficile infection in two phase III randomized, double-blind trials at sites in North America and 7 European countries. Of 1,105 mITT patients, 792 (71.7%), including 719/999 (72.0%) in the per-protocol (PP) population, provided a C. difficile strain at baseline, of whom 356 received fidaxomicin with 330 cures (92.7%) and 363 received vancomycin with 329 cures (90.6%). The susceptibilities (MIC(90)) of baseline isolates did not predict clinical cure, failure, or recurrence for fidaxomicin (MIC(90), 0.25 μg/ml for both; range, ≤ 0.007 to 1 μg/ml), but there was a one-dilution difference in the MIC(90) (but not the MIC(50)) for vancomycin (MIC(90), 2 μg/ml [range, 0.25 to 8 μg/ml] for cure and 4.0 μg/ml [range, 0.5 to 4 μg/ml] for failures). ⋯ When analyzed by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) type, 247/719 (34.4%) isolates were BI group isolates, and the MICs were generally higher for all four drugs tested (MIC(90)s: fidaxomicin, 0.5; vancomycin, 2.0; metronidazole, 2.0; and rifaximin, >256 μg/ml) than for the other REA types. There was no correlation between the MIC of a baseline clinical isolate and clinical outcome. MIC(90)s were generally low for fidaxomicin and vancomycin, but BI isolates had higher MICs than other REA group isolates.
-
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · Nov 2011
Plasma and tissue pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in patients undergoing elective and semielective abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair surgery.
Surgical site infections are common, so effective antibiotic concentrations at the sites of infection, i.e., in the interstitial fluid (ISF), are required. The aim of this study was to evaluate contemporary perioperative prophylactic dosing of cefazolin by determining plasma and subcutaneous ISF concentrations in patients undergoing elective/semielective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) open repair surgery. This was a prospective pharmacokinetic study in a tertiary referral hospital. ⋯ The penetration of unbound drug from plasma to ISF was 85% (78% to 106%). We found correlations present, albeit weak, between cefazolin clearance and cardiac output (r(2) = 0.11) and urinary creatinine clearance (r(2) = 0.12). In conclusion, we found that a single 2-g dose of cefazolin administered 30 min before incision provides plasma and ISF concentrations in excess of the likely MICs for susceptible pathogens in patients undergoing AAA open repair surgery.
-
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · Nov 2011
Is cefazolin inferior to nafcillin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia?
About 20% of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates have a substantial inoculum effect with cefazolin, suggesting that cefazolin treatment may be associated with clinical failure for serious MSSA infections. There are no well-matched controlled studies comparing cefazolin with nafcillin for the treatment of MSSA bacteremia. A retrospective propensity-score-matched case-control study was performed from 2004 to 2009 in a tertiary care hospital where nafcillin was unavailable from August 2004 to August 2006. ⋯ The treatment failure rates were not significantly different at 4 or 12 weeks (10% [4/41] versus 10% [4/41] at 4 weeks [P > 0.99] and 15% [6/41] versus 15% [6/41] at 12 weeks [P > 0.99]). Cefazolin treatment was interrupted less frequently than nafcillin treatment due to drug adverse events (0% versus 17%; P = 0.02). Cefazolin had clinical efficacy similar to that of nafcillin and was more tolerable than nafcillin for the treatment of MSSA bacteremia.
-
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. · Nov 2011
Efficacy of human-simulated exposures of tomopenem (formerly CS-023) in a murine model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.
Tomopenem (formerly CS-023) is a novel carbapenem with improved activity against diverse hospital pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and has a half-life about twice longer than the half-lives of other carbapenems such as imipenem and meropenem. Our objective in this study was to estimate the efficacy of tomopenem in humans by human-simulated exposures in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model against 9 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa with MICs of 4 to 32 μg/ml and 9 clinical isolates of MRSA with MICs of 4 to 16 μg/ml. Human-simulated dosing regimens in neutropenic mice were designed to approximate the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that the free drug concentration exceeds the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions (f%T(MIC)) observed with tomopenem at 750 and 1,500 mg given as a 0.5-h infusion three times a day (TID) in humans. ⋯ Tomopenem at 750 mg showed bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects against 10 of 11 strains of P. aeruginosa and MRSA with MICs of ≤ 8 μg/ml (f%T(MIC) ≥ 41), and tomopenem at 1,500 mg showed bactericidal effects against 16 of 17 strains of P. aeruginosa and MRSA with MICs of ≤ 16 μg/ml (f%T(MIC) ≥ 43). Meropenem at 1,000 mg TID was tested for comparison purposes and showed bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects against 3 of 4 strains of P. aeruginosa with MICs of ≤ 4 μg/ml (f%T(MIC) ≥ 33). From these results, tomopenem is expected to be effective with an f%T(MIC) of over 40 against P. aeruginosa and MRSA strains with MICs of ≤ 8 μg/ml at doses of 750 mg TID and strains with MICs of ≤ 16 μg/ml at doses of 1,500 mg TID.