Annals of emergency medicine
-
As a result of experimental data and favorable clinical impressions, the pneumatic antishock garment (PASG) has gained widespread acceptance as a reasonable standard of care in emergency medical services (EMS) systems. It is currently legislated as required equipment for medical rescue vehicles in two-thirds of the United States. But despite a decade of widespread use, prospective, randomized, controlled trials that demonstrate the efficacy of the PASG have not been published. ⋯ All victims of injury whose systolic blood pressure was 90 mm Hg or less when they initially presented to paramedics in the field were entered into the study. All patients received the identical treatment protocol, with the sole exception of PASG application and inflation to full pressure prior to intravenous catheterization on an alternate day basis. Prospectively collected demographic data have demonstrated that the two resulting groups of PASG and no-PASG patients are well matched in terms of age, sex, injury type, anatomic location of the injury, initial field trauma score, injury severity score and probabilities of survival, as well as the amounts of IV fluids infused in the prehospital setting and the response, scene, and transport times.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Despite the initial successes achieved in early emergency medical services (EMS) systems, many prehospital care services have developed without the intense involvement of physicians whose interest fueled the first experimental medical programs of prehospital care. Among a myriad of variables affecting EMS is the important element of intense, authoritative physician involvement in education, field supervision, and research. Recognizing this problem, many states now have legislated that EMS systems be closely supervised by medical directors. ⋯ It has been the experience of major urban EMS systems that field participation by physicians has lent irrefutable credibility to the authority of medical directors. Beyond the obvious benefits of quality assurance and supervision, the in-field EMS physician provides the impetus and leadership for EMS research conducted at the street level. Because EMS is the practice of medicine through physician surrogates in a prehospital setting, it sets the stage and tone for subsequent patient care and outcome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Resuscitation of the trauma patient: restoration of hemodynamic functions using clinical algorithms.
Two algorithms were developed for immediate fluid resuscitation and subsequent management of emergency trauma patients and critically ill postoperative patients. These algorithms were developed from decision rules based on objective physiologic values attained in patients surviving life-threatening shock and trauma. ⋯ Therapy that supports these compensations and produces the survivor pattern was found to improve survival rates and reduce post-resuscitation complications. These prospective studies confirm the validity of an organized, coherent physiologic approach that has as its goal the achievement of optimal physiologic patterns in contrast to simple restoration of hemodynamic and chemical abnormalities to the normal range, as has been the endpoint of the traditional approach.
-
Injury severity determination serves multiple purposes in trauma care systems by aiding prehospital triage, assisting clinical management, and facilitating outcome evaluation. Numerous authors have described methods for quantifying injury severity, most of which use physiologic status or anatomic injury. ⋯ For clinical management, it provides essential information on initial condition and eventual course, including response to therapy. Finally, for outcome evaluation, it enables objective assessment of care quality, using techniques that determine appropriateness of disability, morbidity, mortality, and reimbursement, based on case mix.
-
Comparative Study
Ground versus air transport of trauma victims: medical and logistical considerations.
Emergency aeromedical transport for trauma victims varies widely, from 10% or less in some programs to more than 90% in others. There is the potential in all such programs for dramatic, lifesaving efforts as well as for costly and dangerous overuse. We propose the following preliminary guidelines for emergency aeromedical transport of trauma victims. ⋯ Scene flights should be dispatched within medical guidelines established by the regional emergency medical services system. Emergency aeromedical evacuation of trauma victims should assist the regionalization of trauma care to centers with special capabilities for the management of seriously injured patients. Promulgation of more detailed guidelines will depend on the accumulation of clinical experience and will be possible only if consistent efforts are made to obtain measures of injury severity, categories of injury, and long-term outcomes of management.