Annals of emergency medicine
-
This retrospective study is a review of patients referred from a network of eight freestanding emergency centers FECs to a hospital emergency department during January and February 1984. During that time, 17,387 patients were seen at the FECs. Sixty-three (0.36%) of these patients were referred to the base hospital, of which 28 (44%) were admitted and six (9.5%) were admitted to a critical care unit. ⋯ Of the patients discharged from the hospital 70% were satisfied with FEC and 97% with hospital treatment. Of admitted patients, 89% were satisfied with FEC and 100% were satisfied with hospital treatment. For a similar illness in the future, 23% of all patients would return to a FEC, 28% would go to a private practitioner, and 48% would go directly to a hospital.
-
The triage process is a valid concept in the initial approach to multiple casualties. Triage tags are, in theory, a reasonable adjunct to the process, but have proved to be a failure in practice. Based on the historical perspective and on the authors' experience with approximately 180 mass casualty drills and incidents, it is recommended that the "daily routine doctrine" be applied and that conventional, color-coded triage tags be replaced by a process of "geographical triage." A valid model for disaster planning is needed, and organizers must conduct drills that are based on the actual threat to the community in order to determine the most efficacious way to manage medical response.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The effectiveness of an organized emergency department follow-up system.
Half the patients discharged home from our emergency department with the diagnoses of acute infection, cervicolumbar strain, bronchospasm, allergic reaction, headache, syncope, vaginal hemorrhage, and undiagnosed chest/abdominal pain were randomly assigned to receive a follow-up telephone call two to three days after their visit. Patients in the follow-up call group were telephoned by an ED nurse who questioned them about changes in their clinical status and clarified the aftercare and referral instructions received during the ED visit. Seven days after the visit, a questionnaire that rated patient satisfaction about six aspects of the ED visit was sent to those patients who had been contacted successfully (study group), and to a diagnosis-matched group of patients (control) who did not receive a follow-up call. ⋯ No difference was observed in questionnaire ratings between the female study and control groups. We conclude that male patients reached by a follow-up telephone call have a more positive perception of their ED visit. A follow-up call also can be useful for reinforcing aftercare instructions, follow-up referrals, and problem-patient identification.
-
An unconscious victim of an overdose was intubated with an endotracheal tube to prevent aspiration. The respiratory therapist deflated the cuff of the endotracheal tube to allow for a retrograde oral air leak and then tightly attached the oxygen tube directly to the endotracheal tube. ⋯ The patient sustained both a hemodynamic and a neurologic decompensation as the result of marked pulmonary overinflation, with bilateral pneumothoraces and probable cerebral and coronary artery air emboli. We present the case in the hope that it will help avoid any such future occurrences.
-
Presented is the case of a 62-year-old man with refractory shock secondary to copper sulfate ingestion. The patient's history was complicated by the presence of peptic ulcer disease, myocardial disease, and a known abdominal aortic aneurysm. Despite the presence of such characteristic signs and symptoms as hemorrhagic gastroenteritis, hemolytic anemia, and refractory hypotension, the diagnosis of copper sulfate ingestion was delayed for several days after ingestion, when the family first volunteered that the patient had vomited blue-green material the day before his admission to the hospital. This delay contributed significantly to the patient's ultimate demise.