Annals of emergency medicine
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Prophylactic penicillin for intraoral wounds.
We conducted a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adult patients to determine whether prophylactic penicillin prevents infection in intraoral lacerations secondary to minor trauma or seizures. Uninfected full-thickness, mucosal-only, or through-and-through wounds presenting within 24 hours of injury were considered. Management consisted of cleansing, irrigation, debridement, and closure as indicated: no topical antibiotics were applied. ⋯ When patients poorly compliant with therapy were eliminated from analysis, none of the penicillin-treated patients and five of the placebo-treated patients developed infections (P = .027). Our data suggest that patients with intraoral wounds may benefit from prophylactic penicillin if compliant with their therapy. More studies are needed to further delineate the usefulness of prophylactic antibiotics for these wounds.
-
The survival rate for patients with prehospital cardiac arrest has improved in some communities with early defibrillation by emergency medical technician-defibrillators (EMT-Ds). In rural areas, previous studies on survival with defibrillation by EMT-Ds have been variable. We conducted an EMT-D study to determine effectiveness in various prehospital settings. ⋯ The neurologic status of survivors at time of hospital discharge was normal in 72%. The average response time, defined as time of emergency medical services activation to the time of EMT-D arrival, was 7.3 +/- 5.8 and 3.7 +/- 2.0 minutes for nonsurvivors and survivors, respectively (P less than .002). There were no survivors when the response time was more than eight minutes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Unstable injury of the cervical spine must be considered in all victims of blunt trauma. To evaluate the role of limited, directed computed tomography (CT) in the initial evaluation of the cervical spine, a one-year study involving 104 high-risk patients was undertaken. ⋯ All false-negative studies involved atlantoaxial rotary subluxation. We conclude that limited, directed CT of the cervical spine is appropriate in the initial evaluation of patients at risk, particularly if plain radiographs are inadequate, but is of limited value in the evaluation of ligamentous injury of the upper cervical spine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of interposed abdominal compression CPR and standard CPR by monitoring end-tidal PCO2.
Interposed abdominal compression CPR (IAC-CPR) has been demonstrated to significantly improve blood flow compared with standard (S)-CPR in animal and electrical models. Studies with IAC-CPR in human beings have not reported data regarding cardiac output. Animal and clinical studies have correlated end-tidal PCO2 (ETPCO2) with cardiac output produced with precordial compressions. ⋯ In patients arriving in cardiac arrest, return of spontaneous circulation was observed in six patients (30%) during IAC-CPR and in one patient (6%) during S-CPR (P = .07). Our study strongly suggests that cardiac output may be significantly increased in human beings with IAC-CPR as evidenced by the significantly greater increases in ETPCO2 with IAC-CPR compared with S-CPR. In addition, IAC-CPR appeared to demonstrate a trend toward increasing the return of spontaneous circulation.
-
Review
Accuracy of interpretations of emergency department radiographs: effect of confidence levels.
We conducted a prospective study to assess the relationship between the interpretive agreement rate for emergency department radiographs and the degree of interpretive confidence. We hoped to identify a subset of ED radiographs that did not require mandatory review by a radiologist. For each of the 1,872 plain radiographs studied, emergency physicians assigned a confidence level to the interpretation before comparing it with the radiologist's dictated report. ⋯ No subset of radiographs had 100% agreement. Treatment was potentially altered in 38 patients as a result of the interpretive disagreement that occurred in 2% of studied radiographs. We conclude that the interpretive agreement rate increases in relation to interpretive confidence but that confidence levels cannot safely exclude certain radiographs from mandatory review by a radiologist.