Annals of emergency medicine
-
Comparative Study
A prospective in-field comparison of intravenous line placement by urban and nonurban emergency medical services personnel.
Emergency medical services personnel are highly proficient at rapid i.v. line placement in the prehospital setting, with little difference between urban and nonurban areas in a geographically diverse state. ⋯ Personnel in the 20 advanced life support agencies studied were extremely adept (rate of 98.3%) at obtaining i.v. line access in the prehospital setting. The time required to complete i.v. line placement was very short, and little difference was noted between urban and nonurban providers. I.v. procedure intervals were shorter for successful attempts, on-scene attempts, and attempts in trauma patients compared with their counterparts.
-
Five percent of children in the United States have asthma. Status asthmaticus is one of the most common conditions for which children seek care in a pediatric emergency department. beta 2-Agonists such as albuterol are the mainstay of emergency therapy for such children. ⋯ This is believed to be the first report of adenosine being successfully used to treat a child with albuterol-induced SVT. We also briefly review the recognition and management of SVT in children and the pharmacokinetics of and indications for adenosine.
-
To describe an effective methodology for the investigation of prehospital cardiac arrest in large cities. ⋯ Concurrent, interactive acquisition of prehospital cardiac arrest data in a large urban setting captured over 98% of the core data recommended for completion of the Utstein template. This methodology may be a suitable means of investigating prehospital cardiac arrest in large cities.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of placement of the laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube by paramedics and respiratory therapists.
To determine the learning curve of nonphysician emergency personnel on placement of the laryngeal mask airway as compared to performance of endotracheal intubation. ⋯ The techniques were timed from the point at which the participant touched the patient to the time they were able to effectively ventilate the patient. Participants also were asked to rate the difficulty of each technique on a 100-mm visual analog score. Failure (three attempts without successful ventilation) rates also were monitored. The mean time to ventilate successfully with the laryngeal mask airway was significantly less than that with the endotracheal tube (38.9 +/- 1.9 seconds versus 206.1 +/- 31.9 seconds, P < .0001). The average number of attempts was 1.0 +/- 0.0 for the laryngeal mask airway and 2.22 +/- 0.21 for the endotracheal tube (P < .01). No one failed to place the laryngeal mask airway; and ten of 19 (52.6%, P < .01) failed to perform endotracheal intubation. The endotracheal tube had a significantly higher rating of difficulty than did the laryngeal mask airway (67.3 versus 8.64, P < .0001).