Annals of emergency medicine
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering.
The effects of pH buffering on the pain of administration and efficacy of three local anesthetics (1% lidocaine, 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and 1% mepivacaine) were investigated in a randomized, prospective, double-blind study of 25 adult volunteers. Plain and buffered solutions of the three local anesthetics were prepared, and a 0.5 intradermal injection of each was administered. Pain of anesthetic infiltration was rated from zero to ten. ⋯ Onset, extent, and duration of skin anesthesia were not statistically altered by pH buffering. The pain of local anesthetic administration can be dramatically reduced by buffering the local anesthetic prior to its infiltration. Anesthetic efficacy is not compromised, and patient acceptance may be significantly increased.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Lack of efficacy of 'weighted' radiographs in diagnosing acute acromioclavicular separation.
The efficacy of "weighted" films in diagnosing grade 3 acromioclavicular (AC) sprains not evident on plain (unweighted) films was evaluated. Eighty-three pairs of radiographs, taken with and without weights, of patients with suspected AC injury were studied. The films were read in a randomized and blinded manner by a staff radiologist. ⋯ In only three cases (4%) did weights cause the injured CC distance to increase and thereby unmask a grade 3 injury not evident on plain films. Further evidence that weights may not reliably elucidate the degree of AC joint injury is suggested by the fact that in several cases the weights actually caused the injured and uninjured CC distance to decrease. We conclude that the use of weighted radiographs lacks efficacy in unmasking grade 3 AC sprains on radiograph and we recommend that routine use of this technique be abandoned.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of blind nasotracheal and succinylcholine-assisted intubation in the poisoned patient.
In the patient obtunded by drug intoxication, the optimal method of airway protection prior to gastric emptying is not clear. We report a prospective randomized trial of two methods of intubation in this patient population. Fifty-two overdose patients with Glascow Coma Scale scores of 12 or less were intubated either orotracheally after succinylcholine administration or nasotracheally. ⋯ Sixty-nine percent of the BNI group experienced epistaxis, 17% had vomiting, and 10% aspirated. We conclude that SAI is a safe and effective method of airway protection in the obtunded poisoned patient. Complications and difficulty in intubation were significantly less with SAI than with blind nasotracheal intubation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A trial of povidone-iodine in the prevention of infection in sutured lacerations.
A prospective, randomized study of 500 consecutive emergency department patients with traumatic lacerations requiring sutures was performed comparing use of topical 1% povidone-iodine (Betadine) and scrubbing with wound management by irrigation with normal saline without scrubbing. A 60-second wound irrigation and scrub with a 1% povidone-iodine solution was the only difference in treatment between the two groups. Data relating to risk factors such as age; degree of contamination; type of closure; ethanol intoxication; mechanism of injury; and bone, joint, or tendon involvement were analyzed. ⋯ Of 201 povidone-iodine group wounds, 11 became infected; two of them (5.4%) were purulent. Of 194 control wounds, 30 became infected, of which 12 (15.46%) were purulent (P less than .01). These data suggest that use of a topical 1% povidone-iodine solution in traumatic lacerations prior to suturing reduces the incidence of wound infections.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The effectiveness of an organized emergency department follow-up system.
Half the patients discharged home from our emergency department with the diagnoses of acute infection, cervicolumbar strain, bronchospasm, allergic reaction, headache, syncope, vaginal hemorrhage, and undiagnosed chest/abdominal pain were randomly assigned to receive a follow-up telephone call two to three days after their visit. Patients in the follow-up call group were telephoned by an ED nurse who questioned them about changes in their clinical status and clarified the aftercare and referral instructions received during the ED visit. Seven days after the visit, a questionnaire that rated patient satisfaction about six aspects of the ED visit was sent to those patients who had been contacted successfully (study group), and to a diagnosis-matched group of patients (control) who did not receive a follow-up call. ⋯ No difference was observed in questionnaire ratings between the female study and control groups. We conclude that male patients reached by a follow-up telephone call have a more positive perception of their ED visit. A follow-up call also can be useful for reinforcing aftercare instructions, follow-up referrals, and problem-patient identification.