American journal of infection control
-
Am J Infect Control · Feb 2001
Comparative StudyCommunity-acquired bacteremia at a teaching versus a nonteaching hospital: impact of acute severity of illness on 30-day mortality.
Few studies have focused recently on the epidemiology of community-acquired bacteremia (CAB) and there have been few comparisons of CAB in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals. ⋯ Among patients with CAB, acute severity of illness on admission was the most important predictor of 30-day mortality at both hospitals. Even though patients with CAB were, on average, more severely ill at the time of admission to the teaching hospital, 30-day mortality rates were not significantly different between the two hospitals because deaths correlated with high APS APACHE III scores at both facilities. The APS APACHE III score on admission provides important prognostic information among patients with CAB.
-
Am J Infect Control · Feb 2001
Comparative StudyChanging concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings.
Long-term central venous access is becoming an increasingly important component of health care today. Long-term central venous access is important therapeutically for a multitude of reasons, including the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, and total parenteral nutrition. Central venous access can be established in a variety of ways varying from catheters inserted at the bedside to surgically placed ports. Furthermore, in an effort to control costs, many traditionally inpatient therapies have moved to an outpatient setting. This raises many questions regarding catheter selection. Which catheter will result in the best outcome at the least cost? It has become apparent in our hospital that traditionally placed surgical catheters (ie, Hickmans and central venous ports) may no longer be the only options. The objective of this study was to explore the various modalities for establishing central venous access comparing indications, costs, and complications to guide the clinician in choosing the appropriate catheter with the best outcome at the least cost. ⋯ Traditional surgically placed central catheters are increasingly being replaced by peripherally inserted central venous access devices. Significant cost savings and fewer severe complications can be realized by preferential use of peripherally inserted central catheters when clinically indicated. Cost savings may not be as significant when comparing radiologically placed versus surgically placed catheters. However, significant cost savings and fewer severe complications are associated with peripheral central venous access versus the surgical or radiologic approach.