Pharmacotherapy
-
Review Comparative Study
Emerging antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome.
Antiplatelet therapy is used widely with proven benefit for the prevention of further ischemic cardiac complications in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) and a history of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The limitations of conventional antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, or prasugrel, as well as the fact that rates of recurrent ischemic events still remain high with use of these agents, underscore the need to investigate alternate agents that may further reduce event rates while limiting bleeding risk. The selection of antiplatelet therapy is further influenced by the following: ticagrelor was approved in July 2011 by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and clopidogrel is slated to become available as a generic productin 2012. ⋯ Trials with the PAR-1 inhibitors have also shown trends toward reductions in cardiac events, but not without the possibility of increased bleeding. More than ever, as the arsenal of antiplatelet therapy expands, health care providers need to understand the pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic differences between conventional and emerging antiplatelet therapies for patients with ACS and CAD. Health care providers must also carefully assess patient-specific factors such as risk of thrombosis, concomitant disease states, age, drug adherence, and aspirin dose, and plan for those patients who will be undergoing CABG when selecting antiplatelet therapy in order to optimally balance bleeding and thrombosis risk.
-
Comparative Study
Effects of targeting higher vancomycin trough levels on clinical outcomes and costs in a matched patient cohort.
To compare clinical outcomes and costs in patients treated with the new vancomycin guidelines recommending goal serum trough concentrations of 15-20 mg/L versus patients treated with vancomycin doses targeting trough concentrations 5-20 mg/L prior to the new guidelines. ⋯ Higher vancomycin trough concentrations improved outcomes in patients with complicated MRSA bacteremia. In addition, more aggressive dosing was shown to significantly decrease overall duration of vancomycin therapy, which may affect total hospital LOS and cost. Patients who experienced nephrotoxicity had a significantly longer hospital LOS. Additional studies evaluating optimal therapy for MRSA bacteremia in a larger cohort of matched patients are warranted.