Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association
-
Prior research has shown that people mispredict their own behavior and preferences across affective states. When people are in an affectively "cold" state, they fail to fully appreciate how "hot" states will affect their own preferences and behavior. ⋯ The same biases apply interpersonally; for example, people who are not affectively aroused underappreciate the impact of hot states on other people's behavior. After reviewing research documenting such intrapersonal and interpersonal hot-cold empathy gaps, this article examines their consequences for medical, and specifically cancer-related, decision making, showing, for example, that hot-cold empathy gaps can lead healthy persons to expose themselves excessively to health risks and can cause health care providers to undertreat patients for pain.
-
Seriously ill individuals, including those seriously ill with cancer, are frequently encouraged to complete instructional advance directives (i.e., living wills) to ensure that their wishes about the use of life-sustaining treatment are honored if they should lose the ability to make decisions for themselves. The authors present a social psychological analysis making explicit a series of steps that must necessarily take place if living wills are to honor the wishes of incapacitated patients. ⋯ In each case, this research raises serious questions about the psychological assumptions underlying the effective use of living wills in end-of-life decision making. Discussion focuses on the need for policy and law guiding the use of advance directives to be informed by both basic and applied research on judgment and decision making.