Annales françaises d'anesthèsie et de rèanimation
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jun 2011
[Implementation strategy of the HAS French surgical check-list in a university hospital].
The check-list (CL) "Safety in Operating Room" has been introduced in our teaching hospital since 2009, associated to a "Quality and Prevention of Risks" program. This introduction was carried out over two distinct phases. The first one was a pilot start including five OR, allowing us to draw firm recommendations on the best way to perform the introduction, followed by a generalization to the other operating room (OR). ⋯ Indeed, the 10 items of the OR should be thought as the last check before the no-return point, which should be shared by anyone in the OR. If these conditions were fulfilled, the CL could be viewed as an actual improvement of safety in the OR. Otherwise, CL is just a supplementary form.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jun 2011
[One year implemention of the safe surgery checklist in France, what has been achieved so far, what could be improved?].
Despite important advances accomplished during the last ten years, patient safety in the OR remains a subject high on everyone's priority list: healthcare professionals, organisations and of course, patients. In this setting, the French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de santé, HAS) conducted a study with the scientific societies of professionals working in the OR. ⋯ Additionally, the organisations receive HAS certification are partners for the programme's promotion. One year after its institution, HAS is undertaking its first evaluation of the lessons and perspectives from the checklist's utilisation.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jun 2011
Editorial Comment[Safety of care: what place for proceduralization?].
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jun 2011
[Deployment of the checklist "Patient safety in the operating room" in two Lorraine hospitals. Performances and difficulties].
To evaluate the implementation of the checklist HAS 2010 in two Lorraine health facilities to identify objectively brakes and levers to suggest possible improvements. ⋯ Good adhesion to the concept, hope for better results after stock enhancement: optimize information and training of all professionals, avoid duplication with other documents. The audit record alone is not a good tool for evaluating the use of LBC, we must associate a self-administered questionnaire.