Social science & medicine
-
Social science & medicine · Nov 1992
Ethics are local: engaging cross-cultural variation in the ethics for clinical research.
Relatively little consideration has heretofore been given to the interaction between Western clinical research ethics and non-Western ethical expectations. How should any conflict that might arise when a biomedical investigator and a research subject come from different cultural settings and have different ethical expectations be addressed? Which ethics should govern such trans-cultural clinical research? The answers to these questions are of increasing importance because many countries of the developing world are presently sites of field testing of biomedical agents sponsored and administered by countries of the developed world, especially in the context of the AIDS pandemic. Drawing mainly on examples from Asian medical systems and settings, I elucidate four possible ethical models to guide the conduct of transcultural biomedical research. ⋯ The cause of the deficiencies of these models lies, I argue, in the way that ethics are ordinarily conceived. The proper approach to ethical conflict recognizes that culture shapes (1) the content of ethical precepts, (2) the form of ethical precepts, and (3) the way ethical conflict is handled. Medical ethics may be viewed in cross-cultural perspective as a form of 'local knowledge', and any differences in such knowledge between cultures--since such differences will not conveniently disappear--must be engaged and negotiated.
-
Social science & medicine · Nov 1992
ReviewPsychosocial factors influencing non-urgent use of the emergency room: a review of the literature and recommendations for research and improved service delivery.
Despite dramatic increases in use of hospital emergency rooms (ERs) since the 1950s, an estimated 85% of ER visits are made for non-life-threatening reasons. Using a modified version of the Andersen and Newman model of health care utilization, this paper reviews the research literature on ER use to examine what is known about factors that influence three stages of the help-seeking process: (1) problem recognition; (2) the decision to seek help; (3) the decision to use the ER. While predisposing factors other than race are not generally significant, enabling factors such as income, insurance coverage, having a usual source of care, and geographic proximity affect use of the ER, both alone and in interaction with race and other factors. ⋯ In addition to the absence of primary care, non-urgent use of the ER is linked to need factors arising from socioeconomic stress, psychiatric co-morbidities, and a lack of social support. Recommendations for future studies include examining prospectively all 3 stages of decision-making leading to ER use, and considering interactive effects among predictors. Implications for service delivery are discussed, including the need to re-structure health care delivery systems to provide greater access to primary care and provide more attention to psychosocial aspects of patient care in clinical settings.