Investigational new drugs
-
Investigational new drugs · Oct 2005
ReviewAnti-erbB-2 antibody trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2-amplified breast cancer.
Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2/erbB-2) is a member of a family of four transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases that regulate cell growth, survival and differentiation via multiple signal transduction pathways. Amplification of the HER2 gene occurs in 20-25% of human breast cancers. This amplification event is an independent adverse prognostic factor as well as a predictive factor for increased response to doxorubicin-based combination chemotherapy, response to trastuzumab and decreased response to hormonal therapy. ⋯ Although trastuzumab is currently usually administered on a weekly intravenous schedule, evidence suggests that a triple dose of the drug given once every three weeks has a pharmacokinetic profile expected to be equally efficacious. Neither the optimal schedule nor the optimal duration of trastuzumab therapy has yet been clearly defined in controlled clinical trials. Current clinical investigations of trastuzumab include its use in both the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings as well as in combination with other chemotherapy drugs or new biologic targeted agents.
-
Investigational new drugs · Aug 2004
Comparative Study Clinical TrialA phase 1 study of OSI-211 given as an intravenous infusion days 1, 2, and 3 every three weeks in patients with solid cancers.
To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of liposomal lurtotecan, OSI-211 (formerly known as NX211), given as a short intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3 every three weeks. ⋯ Two Phase II recommended doses were established for OSI-211 given as a daily x 3 schedule every three weeks. The recommended phase II dose is 1.8 mg/m(2) daily x 3 for minimally pretreated patients and 1.5 mg/m(2) for those heavily pretreated. Phase II studies should be initiated in sensitive tumours.
-
Investigational new drugs · Aug 2003
Phase I studies of weekly administration of cytotoxic agents: implications of a mathematical model.
Certain toxic effects of cytotoxic anticancer agents typically evolve over weeks. When such agents are administered weekly, these effects are cumulative. With such schedules, good medical practice mandates dose modifications with mild or moderate toxicity in order to avoid progression to serious or life-threatening toxicity. ⋯ We find the concept of maximum tolerated dose inadequate for the determination of best doses. We also suggest a strategy for a new phase I study design which can be used to estimate the "best dose" corresponding to a specified delivery rate. In summary, identification of best doses requires attention, not only to dose limiting toxic events, but also to delivered dose rates and schedule adherence.
-
Investigational new drugs · Feb 2003
Comparative Study Clinical TrialA phase I clinical trial of spicamycin derivative KRN5500 (NSC 650426) using a phase I accelerated titration "2B" design.
The spicamycin derivative KRN5500 was considered as a potential anti-cancer agent based on in vitro and preclinical studies. A Phase I study involving 24 cancer patients in whom tumors were refractory to all other conventional therapies was conducted to determine the dose limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, effectiveness, and pharmacokinetic parameters of this drug administered by 1-h IV infusion daily for five consecutive days every 3 weeks. Using an accelerated dose titration strategy, 8.4 mg/m2/d x 5 days was the maximum administered dose. ⋯ The distribution of KRN5500 followed a two-compartment model, and clearance did not decrease significantly over the dose range 0.8-8.4 mg/m2/d x 5. No significant correlation was observed between plasma levels and toxicity. No tumor responses were observed among the 14 patients evaluable for response.
-
Investigational new drugs · May 2001
ReviewBody surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.
Body surface area (BSA) was introduced into medical oncology in order to derive a safe starting dose for phase I studies of anticancer drugs from preclinical animal toxicology data. It is not clear however, as to why dosing by BSA was extended to the routine dosing of antineoplastic agents. Several formulas exist to estimate BSA, but the formula derived by DuBois and DuBois is the one used in adult medical oncology. ⋯ Further only epirubicin, etoposide, and carboplatin have been studied to determine if dosing by BSA would reduce interpatient variability, and none of these drugs were found to have significant relationships between their pharmacokinetics and BSA. Future clinical trials of new agents should not presume that dosing based on BSA reduces interpatient variability. Studies should examine the role, if any, BSA has in dosing new chemotherapeutic agents in initial phase I studies.