Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Role of rectal route in treating cancer pain: a randomized crossover clinical trial of oral versus rectal morphine administration in opioid-naive cancer patients with pain.
The aim of this double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study was to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and time of onset of analgesia after the administration of 10 mg of morphine hydrochloride via the oral and rectal routes in opioid-naive cancer patients with pain. ⋯ A liquid solution of morphine is well absorbed via the rectal route. Rectal morphine is safe, effective, easy to manage, and inexpensive, with a rapid onset of action. Rectal morphine can be considered a valid alternative route for opioid administration and may also be used when rescue doses of morphine are required in patients regularly treated with oral or parenteral opioids.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Short-course FAC-M versus 1 year of CMFVP in node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: an intergroup study.
To compare 1 year of therapy with continuous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (5-FU), vincristine, and prednisone (CMFVP) with a short course of treatment with a doxorubicin-based regimen in the postsurgical adjuvant treatment of patients with hormone receptor-negative, node-positive breast cancer. ⋯ Neither regimen was shown to be superior in terms of overall survival. Because the disease-free survival produced by CMFVP is marginally superior to that produced by FAC-M, we do not recommend FAC-M for further investigation or for routine use. Possible implications of this study are discussed in the context of other adjuvant chemotherapy trials.
-
This analysis was undertaken to review published reports of the comparative efficacy and safety of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in the prophylaxis of acute chemotherapy-induced emesis. ⋯ The 5-HT3 receptor antagonists compared are highly effective antiemetic agents that have now become the standard of care for preventing chemotherapy-induced emesis. Whether the described preclinical differences among these agents are also clinically significant remains to be seen. In the comparative trials analyzed, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists demonstrated relatively equivalent clinical efficacy. Cost analysis may favor the use of one agent over another depending on the emetogenic challenge, dose of the 5-HT3 antagonists, and number of doses recommended. Patient preference may be an important factor to be considered in future antiemetic trials.
-
To review the current clinical uses, ongoing investigations, and future applications of hematopoietic growth factors. Approved cytokines, as well as cytokines not yet released for general use, are included in this review. ⋯ Hematopoietic growth factors have made a significant impact on the prevention of infections associated with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, shortening of neutropenia following high-dose chemotherapy and progenitor-cell transplantation, and chemotherapy-associated anemia. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in future phase III and pharmacologic studies will aid in the assessment of these agents.