Journal of neuro-oncology
-
Journal of neuro-oncology · Dec 2017
Imaging correlates for the 2016 update on WHO classification of grade II/III gliomas: implications for IDH, 1p/19q and ATRX status.
The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System incorporates the use of molecular information into the classification of brain tumors, including grade II and III gliomas, providing new prognostic information that cannot be delineated based on histopathology alone. We hypothesized that these genomic subgroups may also have distinct imaging features. A retrospective single institution study was performed on 40 patients with pathologically proven infiltrating WHO grade II/III gliomas with a pre-treatment MRI and molecular data on IDH, chromosomes 1p/19q and ATRX status. ⋯ No differences in PFS were present when separating by tumor grade. FLAIR border patterns and tumor location were associated with distinct molecular subgroups of grade II/III gliomas. These imaging features may provide fundamental prognostic and predictive information at time of initial diagnostic imaging.
-
Journal of neuro-oncology · Dec 2017
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyHealth-related quality of life, cognitive screening, and functional status in a randomized phase III trial (EF-14) of tumor treating fields with temozolomide compared to temozolomide alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
We characterized health-related quality of life (HRQoL), cognitive, and functional status in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients receiving Tumor treating fields (TTFields) with temozolomide (TMZ) versus TMZ alone in a planned interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial [NCT00916409], which showed significant improvement in progression-free and overall survival with TTFields/TMZ. After radiotherapy with concomitant TMZ, newly diagnosed GBM patients were randomized (2:1) to TTFields/TMZ (n = 210) or TMZ (n = 105). Interim analysis was performed in 315 patients with ≥18 months of follow-up. ⋯ Cognitive status (MMSE) was stable over time. HRQoL, KPS, and MMSE were balanced in both groups over time. There was no preliminary evidence that HRQoL, cognitive, and functional status is adversely affected by the continuous use of TTFields.
-
Journal of neuro-oncology · Dec 2017
Monte Carlo-driven predictions of neurocognitive and hearing impairments following proton and photon radiotherapy for pediatric brain-tumor patients.
As proton radiotherapy (RT) remains a limited resource, predictive estimates of the potential reduction in adverse treatment-related outcomes compared to photon RT could potentially help improve treatment selection. The aim of this study was to predict the magnitude of the neurocognitive and hearing deficits associated with proton and photon RT for children with brain tumors. The existing RT plans for 50 children treated with photon intensity modulated RT were compared with generated intensity modulated proton RT plans. ⋯ Compared to photon plans, the mean brain dose was found to be reduced in all proton plans, translating into a gain of [Formula: see text] IQ points for the whole cohort at 5 years post-RT for dose regimens of 54 Gy, or [Formula: see text] IQ points for dose regimens of 59.4 Gy, where the errors shown represent statistical and systematic uncertainties. The probability of hearing loss ≥20 dB per ear was less for proton versus photon RT: overall (9 ± 4) versus (17 ± 6)%, respectively, based on dose regimens of 54 Gy, and (13 ± 5) versus (23 ± 9)% for dose regimens of 59.4 Gy. Proton RT is thus expected to reduce the detrimental effect of RT upon IQ and hearing as compared to photon RT for pediatric brain tumors.
-
Journal of neuro-oncology · Dec 2017
Metastatic melanoma: prognostic factors and survival in patients with brain metastases.
Brain metastases from malignant melanoma carry a poor prognosis. Novel systemic agents have improved overall survival (OS), but the value of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains uncertain. The melanoma-specific graded prognostic assessment (msGPA) provides useful prognostic information, but the relevance to the modern-day population has not been validated. ⋯ The msGPA remains a valid prognostic indicator in the era of novel systemic treatments for melanoma. BRAF-positive patients receiving targeted agents during their treatment had favorable survival outcomes. WBRT alone should be use with caution in the active management of melanoma brain metastases.