The American journal of emergency medicine
-
The World Wide Web (WWW) is generally used as an information resource. It can also be used as a national and international promotional (advertising) resource, at minimal cost, to assist in physician recruitment, such as for residency training programs. ⋯ This article provides a step-by-step method for creating a simple WWW site (including an HTML template) to promote a residency program and assist in resident recruitment. As more young physicians graduate with more extensive computer skills and familiarity, use of the WWW for physician recruitment will become a more important source of information for physician applicants.
-
Comparative Study
Neural network and linear regression models in residency selection.
For many years, multiple linear regression models have been used at a residency program to generate preliminary rank lists of residency applicants. These lists are then used by the admissions committee as an aid in developing a final ranking to submit to the National Residency Match Program (NRMP). A study was undertaken to compare predictions made using linear regression with those generated by a newer technique, an artificial neural network. ⋯ The linear regression model exhibited a correlation coefficient of 0.74 and an R2 of 54.0%. No significant difference was found (chi 2 = 1.08, P = .7). A neural network performs as well as a linear regression model when used for forecasting the rank order of residency applicants.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Haloperidol, lorazepam, or both for psychotic agitation? A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, emergency department study.
Rapid tranquilization is a routinely practiced method of calming agitated psychotic patients by use of neuroleptics, benzodiazepines, or both in combination. Although several studies have examined the efficacy of the three approaches, none have compared these treatments in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Ninety-eight psychotic, agitated, and aggressive patients (73 men and 25 women) were prospectively enrolled during an 18-month period in emergency departments in five university or general hospitals. ⋯ Significant (P < .05) mean differences on the ABS (hour 1) and MBPRS (hours 2 and 3) suggest that tranquilization was most rapid in patients receiving the combination treatment. Study event incidence (side effects) did not differ significantly between treatment groups, although patients receiving haloperidol alone tended to have more extrapyramidal system symptoms. The superior results produced by the combination treatment support the use of lorazepam plus haloperidol as the treatment of choice for acute psychotic agitation.
-
A recently conducted observational study of the prehospital treatment of uncontrolled atrial fibrillation brought to light therapeutic inconsistencies by emergency providers in dealing with this dysrhythmia. A review of the literature suggests that digoxin lacks efficacy in controlling ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation and that the slow onset of digoxin makes its use in the emergency setting questionable. Because of their demonstrated ability to rapidly slow ventricular rate, the calcium channel blocker, diltiazem, or the beta-adrenergic blocker, esmolol, should be the preferred agents for treating rapid atrial fibrillation in the emergency department or the paramedic ambulance.
-
This study compared the complication rates of tube thoracostomy performed in the emergency department (ED) versus the operating room (OR) and the inpatient ward (IW). A retrospective case series of all patients at an urban, university-based level 1 trauma center hospital who received tube thoracostomy for any indication between 1/1/93 and 12/31/93 was conducted. Complications were defined as empyema, unresolved pneumothorax (persistent air leak or residual pneumothorax), persistent effusion, or incorrect placement. ⋯ When comparing complication rates between the ED and OR, there was no significant difference (P = .3643). A power calculation indicated too small of a sample size to truly determine an insignificant difference between complication rates between the ED and OR. Placement of emergent thoracostomy tubes in the ED does not result in an increased complication rate as compared to placement in the IW.