The American journal of emergency medicine
-
Comparative Study
Percentage of emergency medicine residency graduates who got their first choice of jobs did not change between 1995 and 1997.
The objective of this study was to compare the number of emergency medicine (EM) graduates unable to find a job in the city/area of their first choice in 1995 and 1997. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to EM residents who graduated in both 1995 and 1997. The survey ascertained resident's practice city and state, whether their job was in the city/area of first choice and how satisfied they were with their practice selection. ⋯ These numbers were similar to the 1995 data (P = .79). Job selection was more important than liking (P < .001) or having lived in (P < .001) a desired city/area of practice location. In conclusion, 1997 EM residency graduates were as successful as 1995 graduates in obtaining their first choice of jobs.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intraosseous is faster and easier than umbilical venous catheterization in newborn emergency vascular access models.
The purpose of this study is to compare the speed and ease of establishing newborn emergency vascular access using intraosseous (IO) versus umbilical venous catheterization (UVC). The study is an experimental design. A total of 42 medical students, without prior IO and UVC experience, were recruited as study subjects. ⋯ Although UVC may be preferred by neonatologists, this model suggests that IO results in easier and more rapid vascular access in those who do not frequently perform newborn resuscitation. As such, the benefit of teaching UVC in pediatric resuscitation courses should be reconsidered. The recommended method of emergency newborn vascular access should be reconsidered pending further studies on this subject.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of a new screw-tipped intraosseous needle versus a standard bone marrow aspiration needle for infusion.
The purpose of this study is to compare the speed and ease of establishing intraosseous infusion using a standard bone marrow needle (SBMN; $8) and a new screw-tipped intraosseous needle (Sur-Fast; $42). The study is an experimental design. A total of 42 medical students, without prior IO experience, were recruited as study subjects. ⋯ VAS difficulty scores were lower (easier) for the SBMN for both inexperienced and experienced trials. Success rates were significantly higher for the Sur-Fast needle during the experienced attempt (95% versus 79%, P < .05), but there was no significant difference in success rates during the inexperienced attempt. The Sur-Fast screw-tipped intraosseous needle does not show superiority over the SBMN in this intraosseous model, therefore its higher cost is difficult to justify based on this study.
-
Indications for head computed tomography (CT) scans are unclear in patients with nonpenetrating head injury and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 15. We performed a prospective study to determine if significant intracranial injury could be excluded in patients with GCS-15 and a normal complete neurological examination. A prospective trial of clinically sober adult patients with GCS = 15 on emergency department (ED) presentation after closed head injury with loss of consciousness or amnesia was conducted from May 1996 through April 1997. ⋯ Three patients (5%) had CT scan findings of acute intracranial injury, two of whom had normal neurological examinations. One patient had an acute subdural hematoma requiring emergent surgical decompression; the other had both an epidural hematoma and pneumocephalus that did not require surgery. Significant brain injury and need for CT scanning cannot be excluded in patients with minor head injury despite a GCS = 15 and normal complete neurological examination on presentation.
-
We examined the effect of a visit to an Urgent Care Center (UCC) on emergency department (ED) use by patients with nonemergent complaints. A study population of 1,629 patients with no previous visit to a UCC were identified and served as their own controls. The ED and clinic usage 6 months before and 6 months after a UCC visit were examined. ⋯ Moreover the majority of clinic visits occurred within 90 days after the UCC visit. There was no substantial change in patterns of hospitalization 6 months after the UCC visit. We conclude that UCC usage decreases nonemergent ED use without adverse effects of increased patient hospitalization.