Der Orthopäde
-
Review Comparative Study Controlled Clinical Trial
[Multiplan correction of a 3D deformity. Options and relevance of optimizing the thoracic kyphosis in reconstructive scoliosis surgery].
There is presently still no consensus on how to operatively treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), i.e. a clearly reduced thoracic kyphosis. For a long time the primary focus was mostly on correcting the coronal plane while neglecting the sagittal profile. Based on the current literature and own retrospective data a comprehensive review will be given on the optimal correction of the spine and how to avoid secondary complications. Different operative standard procedures are demonstrated with special attention to the sagittal balance and the special parameters sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal slope (SSL) and pelvic incidence (PI). ⋯ Both the results from the literature and own data confirm that operative correction of AIS needs a careful planning including sagittal spinopelvic parameters. Rigid thoracic hypokyphosis require additional osteotomy.
-
Review Case Reports
[Sagittal deformity. Basic principles of surgical strategies].
There is a large body of literature supporting the importance of restoring sagittal balance to the spine. The main message is this: regardless of the specific surgical strategy and treatment or pathology, rebalancing results in a positive patient outcome. Complex deformity patients need to be evaluated with attention to the global balance and the operative planning and strategy must be adapted accordingly. ⋯ The reason for the outcome may be sagittal imbalance and osteotomy techniques as well as fusion extension may be needed. The postoperative outcome can only be improved when the sagittal balance is already considered in the planning and treatment strategy during initial correction surgery. Concerning sagittal balance a paradigm shift seems to occur.
-
Ignoring the sagittal profile in primary spinal fusion surgery is a common reason for revision surgery. Therefore, it is important that in cases of spinal revision surgery the sagittal alignment is realized. ⋯ Sagittal imbalance after revision surgery is a risk factor for recurrent pseudarthrosis. In cases of pseudarthrosis a combined approach may be more effective in realizing sagittal balance und enhancing rates of fusion.
-
Total disc replacement and posterior dynamic stabilization represent alternatives to lumbar spinal fusion which should reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Disc replacement is indicated for pure discopathy without facet joint degeneration. Spinopelvic balance influences the implant's biomechanics. ⋯ Dynamic stabilization is indicated in moderate discopathy and facet joint degeneration, in degenerative spondylolisthesis grade I with a hypermobile segment and in dynamic lumbar stenosis. The combination of caudal fusion and cranial dynamic stabilization allows a better maintenance of lordosis with multiple level instrumentation and prevents adjacent segment degeneration. If pelvic incidence and sacral slope are high, L5-S1 should be fused because of elevated shear forces.
-
Posttraumatic kyphosis (PTK) is a possible consequence of a missed fracture, a wrong indication for conservative therapy or an inadequate surgical technique but PTK can also be a complication after adequate surgery. Avoidance of PTK is of importance because subsequent surgical therapy can be extensive. ⋯ Knowledge of the principles of sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters are indispensable in the treatment of PTK. Our experience and results from the literature show that a good long-term outcome with limited complications can only be achieved when considering the biomechanical principles as well as restoration of sagittal balance.