Der Orthopäde
-
Pharmacologic treatment options for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I are discussed and drug effectiveness is graded according to the level of evidence available. Various drug strategies in the treatment of CRPS type I, i.e. NSAIDs, corticosteroids, free radical scavengers, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, opioid analgesics, clonidine, capsaicin, NMDA receptor antagonists, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, GABA(B)-agonists, alpha-blockers, IVRA (bretylium/ketanserin), IVRA (clonidine), IVRSB, local anesthetics sympathetic blockade, GLOA and iloprost are discussed.
-
The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), the ulnocarpal joint and the ulnar carpus form an functional anatomical complex, as the head of the ulna is an articulated part of DRUJ as well as having a stabilising action and acting as an abutment due to its direct attachment to the triangular fibrocartilage complex. Pain in this area poses a diagnostic problem due to the close proximity of these structures. In addition to describing the standard clinical examination, the major pathologies of these ulnar hand components, their symptomatology and the basis of their therapy are discussed.
-
The most common cause of an arthritically damaged distal radioulnar joint is a malunion of a distal radius fracture. Therapeutically, ulnar head resection, hemiresection-interposition-technique, Kapandji-Sauvé procedure and implantation of an ulnar head prosthesis have been described. None of these procedures is able to restore the complete function of the joint. ⋯ Biomechanically as well as clinically, replacement of the ulnar head using a prosthesis has been shown to either avoid or solve the problem of instability. We therefore consider ulnar head replacement the treatment of choice in secondary painful instability following resection procedures at the distal end of the ulna. Primary ulnar head replacement should be considered in special indications until long-term follow-up results are available.
-
Review
[Visualisation of phantom- and backpain using imaging techniques. Implication for treatment].
If patients with chronic low back pain are stimulated in the painful region, an expanded representation of the back in the primary somatosensory cortex becomes visible that increases with chronicity. This "pain memory" might play an important role in the chronicity process. In patients with phantom limb pain, e.g. subsequent to the amputation of an arm or leg, a shift in the representation of neighboring areas into the deafferented area in primary somatosensory cortex has been observed. ⋯ The modulation of plasticity and phantom limb pain by anesthesiological manipulation, the use of NMDA receptor antagonists and opioids is presented. Behaviorally relevant stimulation, e.g. by the use of a myoelectric prosthesis or sensory discrimination training can also influence the cortical somatosensory pain memory. More recent studies focus also on brain areas such as the cingulate gyrus believed to be involved in the affective processing of pain.
-
Review Comparative Study
[Questionnaires for patients with back pain. Diagnosis and outcome assessment].
Self-assessment questionnaires are becoming increasingly important in the evaluation and outcome-assessment of low back pain patients, both in the research environment and in everyday clinical practice. Questionnaires allow a standardised, patient-orientated examination of the symptoms and effects of the disease as well as the assessment of change following treatment. The aim of the current review was to provide a summary of the questionnaires that are currently available in the German language for the assessment of patients with low back pain; the review focuses on those that have been shown to be reliable and valid and widely-used on an international basis. ⋯ For the analysis of treatment effects, prospective assessment of the relevant characteristics is recommended - that is, assessments should be made before the treatment and again with identical questionnaires at follow-up. Especially within the context of scientific studies, instruments should be chosen that enable an international comparison of the data generated. In everyday clinical routine, a short standardised documentation of the most important dimensions is recommended.