Resuscitation
-
The aim of our prospective study was to assess the structural and procedural quality of an urban emergency medical services (EMS) system providing prehospital basic and advanced cardiac life support (BLS/ACLS), to compare the onsite performance of physicians and non-physicians in ECG diagnosis and defibrillation, and to identify incidence and causes of avoidable delays in the initial treatment sequences. ⋯ After arrival at the patient's side, for patients with VF/VT, the EMT-Ds took 1:36 min and the physicians took 1:00 min to obtain the first ECG diagnosis (P = 0.004). The first countershock was delivered within 1:42 min by both EMT-Ds and physicians of the mobile intensive care unit (MICU). After diagnosis was established, the EMT-Ds took 0:08 min to defibrillate, whereas the physicians took 0:36 min (P = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Using 14 mongrel dogs, we investigated the correlation between arteriovenous differences of PCO2 (AVD-CO2) and cardiac output (CO) during CPR. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by an electrical current and the respirator was stopped for 5 min. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed during the next 10 min and CO was measured with simultaneous arterial and venous blood gas analysis. ⋯ AVD-CO2 in the low CO group was 39.8 +/- 5.7 mmHg and that of the high group was 27.4 +/- 14.8 mmHg (mean +/- S. D., P < 0.05). In conclusion, AVD-CO2 showed an inverse result with the degree of CO during CPR.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Early defibrillation by emergency physicians or emergency medical technicians? A controlled, prospective multi-centre study.
In a controlled, prospective multi-centre study, defibrillation by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) was compared with the current standard of care in Germany--defibrillation by emergency physicians (EPs)-in order to answer the following questions: can EMTs in a two-tiered emergency medical services (EMS) system with physicians in the field defibrillate earlier than, and as safely as EPs? Does defibrillation by EMTs (study group) affect survival rate and long-term prognosis of patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF), as compared with the current national standards in resuscitation (basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by EMTs, and defibrillation by physicians: control group? ⋯ In our study, EMT defibrillation was equally effective as defibrillation by EPs, but failed to improve survival rates or long-term outcome of patients in VF significantly, compared to EP defibrillation. Due to a reduction in the time intervals from collapse to defibrillation and to ROSC, as well as in adrenalin doses, by EMT-defibrillation, EMTs in Germany should defibrillate if they reach a patient prior to an EP, provided they have received continuous medical training and supervision.
-
The ability to predict outcomes of cardiac arrest before starting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) would be useful for discussions of resuscitation with elders and their families. We thought CPR outcome might be dependent on the severity of pre-existing illnesses. The APACHE II is a severity-of-illness (SOI) scale based, in part, on physiologic parameters whereby points are given for degree of deviation from normal. ⋯ For the young cohort (n = 126; age, < 70; mean age, 59 +/- 8), mean admission APACHE II was 16.5 +/- 7.9 and pre-arrest APACHE II regression analysis.2+ carried out with both APACHE II scores and factors previously correlated with CPR outcome. Witnessed arrests and those requiring a low number of medications were most likely to result in immediate success (restoration of blood pressure) and in a live discharge. APACHE II score (24 h pre-arrest) was associated with live discharge in the regression analysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Comparative Study
Organ blood flow following cardiac arrest in a swine low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass model.
To determine organ blood flow changes, relative to baseline, following cardiac arrest and resuscitation in a closed-chest cardiac arrest swine model using cardiopulmonary bypass to achieve reproducible return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). ⋯ This low-flow bypass model produces reproducible high resuscitation rates and ROSC times. Early post-resuscitation organ blood flow is characterized by a selective hyperemia involving the cerebral, myocardial and adrenal vascular beds, in contrast to hypoperfusion of the pulmonary and mesenteric vascular beds.