Resuscitation
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Standard doses versus repeated high doses of epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital.
Among all of the cathecolamines used for cardiac arrest treatment, epinephrine injection during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation is currently the most powerful means of enhancing effectiveness; however, deliberations about the optimal dosage have recently become intense. In the SAMU of Lyon (F), we conducted a double blind prospective randomized study over an 18-month period, comparing repeated standard-dose epinephrine (1 mg) and repeated high-dose epinephrine (5 mg) in the management of cardiac arrest outside the hospital. Five-hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled with 265 in the standard-dose group and 271 in the high-dose group; both groups are globally similar. ⋯ We never noticed cardiac or neurologic adverse effects with the high doses. The results of this study are not statistically significant, but we observed a marginal trend towards repeated 5 mg epinephrine doses. A large French multicentre study is now necessary.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of exertion required to perform standard and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Active compression-decompression (ACD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) utilizes a hand-held suction device with a pressure gauge that enables the operator to compress as well as actively decompress the chest. This new CPR method improves hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters when compared with standard CPR. ACD-CPR is easy to perform but may be more labor intensive. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the work required to perform ACD and standard CPR. ⋯ Approximately 25% more work is required to perform ACD-CPR compared with standard CPR. Both methods require subanaerobic energy expenditure and can therefore be sustained for a sufficient length of time by most individuals to optimize resuscitation efforts. Due to the slightly higher work requirement, ACD-CPR may be more difficult to perform compared with standard CPR for long periods of time, particularly by individuals unaccustomed to the workload requirement of CPR, in general.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The technique of endobronchial lidocaine administration does not influence plasma concentration profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters in humans.
This study investigated plasma concentration profiles, pharmacokinetic characteristics and side-effects of lidocaine following 3 different administration techniques. Sixty ASA I/II patients undergoing elective ENT-operations were randomised into 4 groups. Lidocaine 1% (1 mg/kg) was administered 50 min before the end of the operation, via a regular endotracheal tube (group 1), a suction-catheter deep endobronchially (group 2), or an EDGAR-(Endobronchial-Drug and Gas Application during Resuscitation)-tube characterized by a separate injection channel ending at the orifice of the tube (group 3). ⋯ Patients from group 3 were ventilated continuously because of a separate injection channel integrated in the EDGAR-tube. Sore throat was significantly increased in group 2 as compared with groups 1, 3 and 4. Asorption of lidocaine in groups 1-3 resulted in maximal mean plasma concentrations ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 micrograms/ml after 16.9 to 22.4 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
The aim of this study was to describe factors associated with in-hospital mortality among patients being hospitalised after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and who were found in ventricular fibrillation. The study was set in the community of Göteborg, Sweden. The subjects consisted of all patients who were hospitalised alive after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, being reached by our mobile coronary care unit and who were found in ventricular fibrillation, between 1981 and 1992. ⋯ In a multivariate analysis considering various aspects of status on admission to hospital, the following were independently associated with death: (1) degree of consciousness (P < 0.001) and (2) systolic blood pressure (P < 0.05). In conclusion, among patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest found in ventricular fibrillation and being hospitalised alive, 54% died in hospital. The in-hospital mortality was related to patient characteristics before the cardiac arrest as well as to factors at the resuscitation itself.
-
To compare and contrast outcomes following cardiac arrest managed in two Accident and Emergency departments, and to identify factors which might account for such differences. ⋯ Patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Edinburgh have a significantly better chance of being admitted to a ward. There is a trend favouring better survival to discharge in Edinburgh, but with the numbers investigated this does not achieve statistical significance. Amongst those factors which contribute to survival there are fewer witnessed arrests, less bystander CPR and slower ambulance response times in those brought to GRI. There is a need to investigate the environment in which patients collapse, to train the public in CPR, and to review the efficiency and resourcing of the ambulance service.