Resuscitation
-
This paper examines the initial actions that should take place following the sudden collapse of a patient in a hospital. The current Basic Life Support guidelines are not designed for this situation, yet are commonly taught to hospital staff. ⋯ Additional factors, such as the recognition of the sick patient and the importance of audit should be included in hospital resuscitation training. A tiered approach to resuscitation training within a hospital should be adopted and national standards developed.
-
Between October 1996 and February 1998 we have provided five PLS instructors courses for 127 physicians. The instructor course takes 20-24 h over in 3 days, with 20-36 students per course. Theory classes last 5 h and practical stations between 14 and 18 h. ⋯ At the end of the course the students perform an anonymous written evaluation of the course with scores between 1 (very bad), 2, 3, 4 and 5 (very good). Theoretical aspects practical classes, methodology, and organisation of the PLS instructors courses are considered satisfactory by the students. We conclude that PLS instructors courses are important for assuring the uniformity and quality of paediatric life support courses.
-
Current European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines for paediatric basic life support advocate delivery of 20 cycles/min at a compression rate of 100/min and a compression:ventilation ratio of 5:1 (Resuscitation 1997;34:115-27; Resuscitation 1998;37(2):97-100). We have evaluated whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be delivered at this rate by hospital providers. We recruited 24 rescuers, all of whom had successfully completed a training course in paediatric life support. ⋯ The guidelines make no allowance for time spent moving between compression and ventilation activity. Future consensus statements should take account of this transfer time. Any changes in recommendations should obviously be prospectively audited with Utstein-style reporting and studies of practicability.
-
Comparative Study
Electrocardiographic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest patients.
Following out-of-hospital defibrillation attempts, electrocardiographic instability challenges accurate assessment of defibrillation efficacy and post-shock rhythm. Presently, there is no precise definition of defibrillation efficacy in the out-of-hospital setting that is consistently used. The objective of this study was to characterize out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rhythms following low-energy biphasic and high-energy monophasic shocks in order to precisely define defibrillation efficacy and establish uniform criteria for the evaluation of shock performance. ⋯ Defibrillation should uniformly be defined as termination of VF for a minimum of 5-s after shock delivery. Rhythms should be reported at 5-s after shock delivery to assess early effects of the defibrillation shock and at 60-s after shock delivery to assess the interaction of the defibrillation therapy and factors such as post-shock myocardial dysfunction and the patient's underlying cardiac disease.
-
A retrospective 6-month audit of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Hong Kong following the introduction of automatic external defibrillators is presented. During the 6-month period from 1 July 1995 to 31 December 1995, resuscitation was attempted on 754 patients. Of the 744 patients with cardiac arrest whose records were available, 53.6% had a witnessed arrest. ⋯ The survival rate of 1.6% is low by world standards. To improve the survival rates of people with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the arrest-to-call interval must be reduced and the frequency of bystander CPR assistance increased. Once these changes are in place, a beneficial effect from the use of pre-hospital defibrillation might be seen.