Resuscitation
-
Methods of rewarming patients with severe accidental hypothermia remain controversial. This paper reports our experience with the use of forced air rewarming in patients with severe accidental hypothermia and a body core temperature below 30 degrees C. Fifteen hypothermic patients (body core temperature 24-30 degrees C) were successfully treated with forced air rewarming to a body core temperature above 35 degrees C (mean rewarming rate 1.7 degrees C/h, range from 0.7 to 3.4 degrees C/h). ⋯ Group 2 patients needed catecholamine support during rewarming more frequently (83 versus 22%) and had higher lactate levels and lower pH values at all points of observation. In conclusion our preliminary data indicate that forced air rewarming is an efficient and safe method of managing patients with severe accidental hypothermia. The poor outcome of patients with a history of prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation is probably due to irreversible ischaemic brain damage in primarily asphyxiated avalanche and near-drowning victims, rather than the consequence of the rewarming method used.
-
Comparative Study
Vasopressin versus epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized swine outcome study.
In animal models, vasopressin improves short-term outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for ventricular fibrillation compared to placebo, and improves myocardial and cerebral hemodynamics during CPR compared to epinephrine. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that vasopressin would improve 24-h neurologically intact survival compared to epinephrine. After a 2-min untreated ventricular fibrillation interval followed by 6 min of simulated bystander CPR, 35 domestic swine (weight, 25+/-1 kg) were randomly provided with a single dose of vasopressin (20 U or approximately 0.8 U kg(-1) intravenously) or with epinephrine (0.02 mg kg(-1) intravenously every 5 min). ⋯ Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was attained in 12/18 (67%) vasopressin-treated pigs versus 8/17 (47%) epinephrine-treated pigs, P = 0.24. Twenty-four hour neurologically normal survival occurred in 11/18 (61%) versus 7/17 (41%), respectively, P = 0.24. In conclusion, vasopressin administration during CPR improved coronary perfusion pressure, but did not result in statistically significant outcome improvement.
-
Immersion in cold water is compatible with long-term survival, even when the period of immersion is relatively long. Guidelines for resuscitation after immersion stress the importance of prolonged resuscitation using advanced life support techniques. ⋯ Members of the emergency services, are failing to both initiate prehospital resuscitation and to continue this to hospital for victims of near drowning. There appears to be potential to reduce the drowning death rate by improving resuscitation. The emergency services and the public should be educated about the need to resuscitate those found in water.
-
Current European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines for paediatric basic life support advocate delivery of 20 cycles/min at a compression rate of 100/min and a compression:ventilation ratio of 5:1 (Resuscitation 1997;34:115-27; Resuscitation 1998;37(2):97-100). We have evaluated whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be delivered at this rate by hospital providers. We recruited 24 rescuers, all of whom had successfully completed a training course in paediatric life support. ⋯ The guidelines make no allowance for time spent moving between compression and ventilation activity. Future consensus statements should take account of this transfer time. Any changes in recommendations should obviously be prospectively audited with Utstein-style reporting and studies of practicability.
-
Comparative Study
Electrocardiographic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest patients.
Following out-of-hospital defibrillation attempts, electrocardiographic instability challenges accurate assessment of defibrillation efficacy and post-shock rhythm. Presently, there is no precise definition of defibrillation efficacy in the out-of-hospital setting that is consistently used. The objective of this study was to characterize out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rhythms following low-energy biphasic and high-energy monophasic shocks in order to precisely define defibrillation efficacy and establish uniform criteria for the evaluation of shock performance. ⋯ Defibrillation should uniformly be defined as termination of VF for a minimum of 5-s after shock delivery. Rhythms should be reported at 5-s after shock delivery to assess early effects of the defibrillation shock and at 60-s after shock delivery to assess the interaction of the defibrillation therapy and factors such as post-shock myocardial dysfunction and the patient's underlying cardiac disease.