Resuscitation
-
Biography Historical Article
The resuscitation greats. Dr. William Cullen and Lord Cathcart.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Quality of lay person CPR performance with compression: ventilation ratios 15:2, 30:2 or continuous chest compressions without ventilations on manikins.
The new CPR guidelines emphasise chest compression depth and have increased the compression:ventilation ratio to cause less time intervals without chest compressions. How this change may influence the quality of chest compressions is not documented. Sixty-eight volunteers among travellers at Oslo international airport and a senior citizen centre performed 5 min of CPR on a manikin with compression:ventilation ratios 15:2, 30:2 or continuous chest compressions. ⋯ Number of compressions per minute was 40 +/- 9, 43 +/- 14 and 73 +/- 24 and percent no flow time 49 +/- 13%, 38 +/- 20% and 1 +/- 2%, respectively. In conclusion, continuous chest compressions without ventilations gave significantly more chest compressions per minute, but with decreased compression quality. No flow time for 30:2 was significantly less than for 15:2.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by trained laypersons and an assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Complete chest wall recoil improves hemodynamics during CPR by generating relatively negative intrathoracic pressure, which draws venous blood back to the heart, providing cardiac preload prior to the next chest compression. ⋯ The Hands-Off Technique decreased compression duty cycle but was 46.3 times more likely to provide complete chest wall recoil (OR: 46.3; CI: 16.4-130.3) compared to the Standard Hand Position without differences in accuracy of hand placement, adequate depth of compression, or perceived discomfort with its use. All forms of manual CPR tested (including the Standard Hand Position) in trained laypersons produced an inadequate depth of compression for two-thirds of the time. These data support development and testing of more effective layperson CPR training programmes and more effective means to deliver manual as well as mechanical CPR.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study.
To compare quality of CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with and without automated feedback. ⋯ Automatic feedback improved CPR quality in this prospective non-randomised study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Increased compression depth was associated with increased short-term survival.
-
Multicenter Study
Effectiveness and long-term outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in paediatric intensive care units in Spain.
To analyse the immediate effectiveness of resuscitation and long-term outcome of children who suffered a cardiorespiratory arrest when admitted to paediatric intensive care units (PICU). ⋯ One-third of children who suffer a cardiac or respiratory arrest when admitted to PICU survive, and most of them had a good long-term neurological and functional outcome. The duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts is the best indicator of mortality.