Resuscitation
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Active compression-decompression resuscitation: a prospective, randomized study in a two-tiered EMS system with physicians in the field.
Improved cardiopulmonary circulation with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) has been demonstrated in studies using different animal models and a small number of humans in cardiac arrest (CA). However, prehospital studies have shown both positive and no extra benefit of ACD-CPR on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hospital admission and discharge rates. The aim of our prospective study was to compare standard manual CPR (S-CPR) with ACD-CPR as the initial technique of resuscitating patients with out-of-hospital CA, with respect to survival rates and neurological outcome. ⋯ Concerning complications of CPR, there was no difference between the groups. In our two-tiered EMS system with physician-staffed ambulances, ACD-CPR neither improved nor impaired survival rates and neurological prognosis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The new CPR technique did not increase the complications associated with the resuscitation effort.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
High dose and standard dose adrenaline do not alter survival, compared with placebo, in cardiac arrest.
This trial compared blinded 10 mg aliquots of adrenaline with placebo in 194 cardiac arrest patients treated in hospital using American Heart Association guidelines. In-hospital and out-of-hospital arrests were included. Of the 339 eligible patients a large proportion (145 (45%)) were not randomised and received open 1 mg aliquots of adrenaline. ⋯ No significant differences in immediate survival (IS) or hospital discharge (HD) exists between open 1 mg adrenaline (IS 14 (9.7%), HD 3 (2%)) or the 10 mg adrenaline (IS 9 (9.6%), HD 0) vs. placebo (IS 7 (7%), HD 0) trial arms. Patients reaching the point of use of adrenaline have a uniformly poor immediate survival (8.8%) and hospital discharge rate (0.9%). Dosing with 10 mg or 1 mg adrenaline does not influence outcome compared with placebo.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Buffer therapy during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
The effects of infusing a buffer solution on resuscitability and outcome was tested in patients during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A number (502) of adults with asystole or ventricular fibrillation with failure of first defibrillation attempt were entered into a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Of these, 245 patients received 250 ml of sodium bicarbonate-trometamol- phosphate mixture with buffering capacity 500 mmol/l and 257 patients received 250 ml 0.9% saline. ⋯ Mean base excess at hospital admission was -9 after Tribonat vs. -11 after saline (P = 0.04, CI for difference 0.2-3.8). Only 16 of the 502 patients had arterial alkalosis on arrival in the hospital and no patient had a positive base excess. Patients resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest had metabolic acidosis, but buffer therapy did not improve the outcome.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Standard doses versus repeated high doses of epinephrine in cardiac arrest outside the hospital.
Among all of the cathecolamines used for cardiac arrest treatment, epinephrine injection during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation is currently the most powerful means of enhancing effectiveness; however, deliberations about the optimal dosage have recently become intense. In the SAMU of Lyon (F), we conducted a double blind prospective randomized study over an 18-month period, comparing repeated standard-dose epinephrine (1 mg) and repeated high-dose epinephrine (5 mg) in the management of cardiac arrest outside the hospital. Five-hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled with 265 in the standard-dose group and 271 in the high-dose group; both groups are globally similar. ⋯ We never noticed cardiac or neurologic adverse effects with the high doses. The results of this study are not statistically significant, but we observed a marginal trend towards repeated 5 mg epinephrine doses. A large French multicentre study is now necessary.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of exertion required to perform standard and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Active compression-decompression (ACD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) utilizes a hand-held suction device with a pressure gauge that enables the operator to compress as well as actively decompress the chest. This new CPR method improves hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters when compared with standard CPR. ACD-CPR is easy to perform but may be more labor intensive. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the work required to perform ACD and standard CPR. ⋯ Approximately 25% more work is required to perform ACD-CPR compared with standard CPR. Both methods require subanaerobic energy expenditure and can therefore be sustained for a sufficient length of time by most individuals to optimize resuscitation efforts. Due to the slightly higher work requirement, ACD-CPR may be more difficult to perform compared with standard CPR for long periods of time, particularly by individuals unaccustomed to the workload requirement of CPR, in general.